Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Why keep calling out Boeing? (Score 1, Insightful) 159

Why do we always see these messages calling out Boeing, as though they had a hand in the crash?

For news reports for a car crash we don't commonly see things like Ford Bronco plows into crowd of people as if the Bronco or Ford had any involvement in the driver's actions...

If it comes out that it was an issue with the plane, and it's not a maintenance issue and really is a product flaw, then yeah, let's blame the manufacturer all day long.

Until then, all this does is associate a really horrible accident to a company/product that might not have anything at all to do with it.

Comment Hype vs Reality (Score 1) 79

What Andrew describes is the reality. I vibe code all day too, I admit it. It helps me reduce the amount of mundane code I otherwise have to write. But the non-mundane code, that always needs to be reviewed and often needs adjustments, etc. As a tool, it does make me more efficient, but it is a far cry from being able to replace me.

But that's not the hype. The hype is that it's generating complete apps ready for sale on the app stores, or a vibe coder gets millions of VC cash because they created an app in a weekend and they don't even know how to program...

The hype has the c-suite thinking they don't need humans for many jobs now, so they're eyeing those big bonuses they'll be able to rake in by laying off large portions of their organization. They should be thinking how much more they'll get from their workforce by making them more productive, instead they expect to get the same level of productivity but with fewer (or better, no) people.

Boy, are they going to be surprised when that just doesn't happen...

Comment RTFM (Score 2) 103

RTFM has always been a problem in our industry. I can remember in Usenet days asking questions and getting responses like RTFM or "I found your answer over here on http://goatse.cx/ ..."

SO works until everyone gets tired of answering the same questions over and over because the posters don't want to RTFM, they just want a quick answer.

And so AI is killing them now because AI doesn't care how many times someone asks a previously asked/answered question, it will happily reply to every question as best it can (even though it may hallucinate a response, it's still better than RTFM).

Comment The citations are NOT the problem... (Score 5, Insightful) 113

The problem is in the actual content of the report. It too is full of made up crap sourced from unknown origins all to support a questionable policy position by someone with no medical training and generally considered to be on the fringe on most topics.

The citations only prove that they're making crap up to support their arguments and positions.

Comment We have a bad habit... (Score 1) 238

We have a bad habit of telling HS students that they need a name brand degree, when often any degree can get them in the door.

Name brand schools can be hard to get into, often come with a great deal of debt, and often the degree isn't worth any more than one from those of the typical state schools (from an employment perspective).

I had dreams of going to Drexel, but I did just fine graduating from BGSU.

Comment Re:Try attending a quantum physicist convention (Score 3, Insightful) 51

Do you expect to understand all their jargon? So why do you assume that economics must be understood by the average person?

If I attend, no I don't expect to understand all their jargon.

But if one of the speakers is going to come to slashdot to self promote their paper? Then yes, I expect them to ditch their jargon and speak to the larger group.

Comment In Plain English... (Score 2, Informative) 51

I asked ChatGPT to redo this really fugly summary they used here:

The Evolution of Mainstream Macroeconomics (Plain English Version) The Big Picture

This paper looks at how economists who study the entire economy (things like inflation, recessions, and unemployment) have changed their thinking over the last 40 years. The key idea: “Economists used to argue a lot about how to model the economy, but now they mostly agree on the basics — and that’s mostly a good thing.”

1. Economists Used to Disagree a Lot — Now They're More Aligned

Over time, economists have reached common ground in three main areas:

Methodology (How they build models)

  • Start from how individuals and businesses behave ("microfoundations").
  • Include real-world imperfections like taxes, regulation, and irrational behavior.
  • Less focus on assuming people are always perfectly rational or predict the future accurately.

Architecture (Structure of the models)

  • Most economists now agree that prices and wages don’t change instantly (this is called "nominal rigidity").
  • This helps explain real-world issues like booms and recessions.

Mechanisms (What causes the economy to move)

  • Economists now accept that "shocks" (surprises) can affect both supply (production) and demand (spending).

2. Why This Agreement Is Mostly Good

  • It gives economists a common foundation to build from.
  • Makes it easier to test new ideas and solve real problems.
  • Reduces endless debates over the basics of model-building.

But There’s a Catch

Sometimes economists try to model the whole economy at once (called "general equilibrium") when it might be smarter to just look at one part of it first ("partial equilibrium"). This can make things more complicated than necessary.

TL;DR

Over the last 40 years, economists have stopped fighting over how to model the economy and started agreeing on some key ideas. That’s helped the field grow, even if they sometimes overcomplicate things by trying to explain everything at once.

Comment Re:I really f*cking hate those things... (Score 1) 42

Sure, but the options they give you don't include "fake trailers".

Of course I'm interested in the movie, I'm interested in the other aspects, I don't want Google to filter out any of those things.

I'm just not interested in fake crap created by someone trying to monetize interested in the film, but that's never an option that shows up as a filter.

Comment Let's get real... (Score 5, Insightful) 180

Google didn't invest in the web browser to help humanity.

It is full of all of their hooks to get every scrap of personal information out of you that it can, and they use this info to make billions of dollars as a result.

They had a vested interest in building and pushing Chrome. The push to sell is to separate the concerns, to let the browser & the web develop independently from the gorilla that wants to squeeze money out of you and everyone else.

Comment You're always the product... (Score 2) 42

It's because businesses like I Am Becoming rely on additional money they get from Shopify, so they turned Brandon into a product just because he purchased something from them.

And Shopify then sells all of those products that they paid for to whomever is interested in paying them for it.

So when

A spokesman for Shopify said the decision "attacks the basics of how the internet works,"

he's really referring to how doing anything online makes you a product for someone else to buy or sell and, oh yeah, f*ck you if you don't want to be a product.

Slashdot Top Deals

Professional wrestling: ballet for the common man.

Working...