Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment "historic" (Score 2) 35

How on earth is that historic? Off the top of my head, SBF was in talks with senators to develop regulations around crypto (highly ironic considering what happened) and that wasn't even half a year ago. The best way to keep profits high is to limit or hinder your competition, and the most effective way to do that is to lobby for laws that do just that. It's not rocket science, it's been done before, and it will surely be done far into the future as well.

Comment Re:Re-evaluating Clippy (Score 1) 47

Personally, my experience has been the opposite. For example, I've found myself using the "Tell me what you want to do" feature in Word/Excel on numerous occasions for work. Yes, I could probably memorize where to go in the UI to do what I want, but that's a lot of UI to remember for a program I use maybe a few times a week at most. Or the feature where you can long-press on your phone's home button and dictate what you want it to do. I find it to be more accessible for doing quick things like setting a reminder or an alarm. You could argue that you can't really call that AI since it's far more specialized and isn't even close to passing the Turing test, but regardless I've found those kinds of things to be useful, privacy concerns notwithstanding.

Comment Re:That's easy. (Score 1) 82

There's a limit to things. Once it becomes bad enough, companies will opt to suspend doing business in their most unprofitable areas. That means less competition in those areas, which increases the bargaining power of the remaining companies. I lived in an area where, for a long time, the only ISP in town was Verizon. And believe me, paying top dollar for poor service and having to wait hours on a phone for customer service was not fun. Worst part is that you can't tell them to get lost because what are you going to do, disconnect yourself from the internet entirely?

Comment Regulatory capture (Score 3, Insightful) 139

I suspect that any regulation on AI will end up being twisted by lobbyists into something that only makes it economically feasible to use for the same wealthiest companies that the article writer wants it to be kept away from. That's not to say there shouldn't be any regulation, just that my hopes aren't too high if it does come to pass.

Comment Re:IANAB (I am not a Banker), but (Score 1) 227

There was another statement which seemed to imply to me that the government was putting out loans to cover the difference, like what happened in 2008. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.federalreserve.gov... I'm not very well-educated when it comes to financial topics like this, so please inform me if I'm mistaken.

Comment Re:Should have read the ToS - contract issue (Score 1) 244

Problem is, the same kinds of legalese that lets them modify products after sale also lets them do much more heinous stuff. Sony, for example, decided to remove some movies from their store about a year ago or so. By that, I don't mean that they just removed the ability to purchase them. I mean that they literally went into people's libraries and deleted them even though they had been purchased. Legally, they might have been in the right. Morally, it's a pretty disturbing trend, especially when you consider that the language for this would be buried in a 100-page EULA nobody has the time or legal expertise to understand.

Slashdot Top Deals

Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982

Working...