Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment The 'unlocked' price was too high... (Score 1) 196

I have to imagine that if the unlocked price was below $400 (or even the price of a locked phone) it would of sold like hot cakes but unfortunately I think Google had too many external pressures to that prevented them from pricing it accordingly.

Instead, Google *flooded* the net with ads for the N1 hoping their marketing muscle would overcome all other obstacles.

Idle

Submission + - The definitive evisceration of The Phantom Menace. (youtube.com) 4

cowmix writes: "When TPM came out ten years ago, its utter crappiness shocked me to the core and wounded a entire generation of geeks. My inner child had been abused and betrayed. I moped around, talking to no one, for almost two weeks. I couldn't bring myself to see #2 or #3, whatever they were called. Now, a decade later, comes "Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review" the ultimate seven part, seventy minute analysis of this mother of all train wrecks. Not only does it nail how the film blows, but tells us why. Time, apparently, does not heal all wounds."

Comment I call BS on the whole thing... (Score 1) 193

The movie tie-ins are pure genius and uniquely Lego.. They have a good sense of humor and the new Lego sets are fun. As a 35 year Lego guy, it find the new stuff simply awesome.

The irony is that the Star Wars Lego sets are MORE Lego like than their 'original' sets they put out now. The piece on the Star Wars sets are more interchangeable while their "Mars" series has these HUGE molded pieces that can not really be used outside of the ship you are 'supposed' to build.

However, if you want to find something that sucks the soul out of Lego.. look no further than Bionicle.

Comment Re:Krugman's prognostication skills aren't all tha (Score 1, Interesting) 127

Yes, it couldn't have been the artificially low interest rates, which means they are increasing the monetary supply much more than they should, which caused the housing bubble (not to mention the NASDAQ bubble), its that darn "deregulation," which of course means different regulations and happened over the course of 3 decades.

Of course, Krugman actually advocated created a housing bubble in 2002.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/02/opinion/dubya-s-double-dip.html

Krugman is just an organ for the Federal Reserve and the state.

I just reread that post and I don't understand how in that op-ed piece Krugman advocated creating the housing bubble.

Can you explain this to me?

thanks

Slashdot Top Deals

How come everyone's going so slow if it's called rush hour?

Working...