all of these completely ignorant comments show you've never even been in San Francisco let alone lived there. you don't know the difference between the Tenderloin and downtown. you don't know that homelessness has been a problem for decades. you don't know that putting "hobos" in jail is the most costly imaginable solution. you don't know that crime is nowhere close to historic highs.

keep getting all of your information from Faux news. no axe to grind there, nosireebob. stay ignorant -- it's easier.

yet another idiot who has never lived in San Francisco. downtown != the Tenderloin.

yet another outside with no clue about San Francisco but... with an uniformed opinion. and the police are the problem because they are lazy and fat. as it ever were

drag them... where? jail? the most expensive conceivable way to house them?

tell me you've never been to San Francisco without saying you've never been to San Francisco.

Especially considering that that is where a tremendous amount phishing is instigated. We have the tools to do it with DKIM, SPF and DMARC yet MUA vendors have been pathetically behind the times with some like Thunderbird doing nothing at all, and they are all pretty inconsistent with one another. For alerting, email is a different creature than web stuff since it is usually the initial vector to an attack and often arrives unsolicited unlike the web. We all know that the lock icon is not a panacea, but that doesn't mean it didn't have value especially when TLS was relatively uncommon and ecommerce was new.

It's been nearly 20 years since the rise of email authentication standards like DKIM and SPF to combat spam and phishing. Thunderbird does exactly nothing on the UI front which is pretty shameful. Research shows that alerting users has a positive effect but the patchy support in UI's is hindering any positive feedback loop that could help users identify phishing attempts. It's a complete mystery why Mozilla has been so indifferent to one of the most serious security threats that email users face.

Just what I'd like to do moving from a free country to someplace that is extremely misogynistic, homophobic and altogether backward. i can just see the bay area emptying out at the opportunity

Are the new algorithms really expensive computationally? I don't know if they are like RSA but RSA verification is pretty cheap these days. Why would these new algorithms need silicon support from the get go?

I have a 8kw solar installation and 16kwh battery. the total cost after rebates was about $23k

why they are targeting this wide spot in the road on the other hand is a mystery

the 80's were about getting 32 bit processors. the 68000, the 32000, the 80386 etc. 8088's were very, very early 80's but the 80386 came out pretty soon after. 6502's weren't really serious CPU's back then. they were used in the same way that Z80's were used: more for embedded and those kinds of uses.

huh? I designed the software for a laser printer controller which could drive a 100ppm printer at speed. video ram was a thing back then so you could easily drive displays. this was 1985.

the Caldor fire started as a 40 acre fire. the federal government is in charge of the vast majority of forests in California. where is your rake?
and please learn to spell his name right: it's Newsom

nit: the server never sees the private key ever.