Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Maybe they WERE attacked. (Score 1) 205

Why does it require a "high" degree of evidence? It only requires evidence. And speaking of evidence, the FCC has provided exactly zero in terms of a DDoS attack. What reason have they given for anyone to trust their word, especially in light of the deliberately convoluted and lengthy process involved in just leaving a public comment?

Comment Re: RTFS (Score 1) 205

Of course that's what the FCC said. It works in their interest if less informed people think they're the victim. They are not. Watch Oliver's segment to see the ridiculous maze anyone had to get through just to leave a public comment on the FCC's site. Their intent from the very beginning was to choke off and stifle public comment. The commenting process is clear evidence of that.

Comment Re: Mistaking a large # of people (Score 1) 205

Did you even watch the segment? If you had and seen the ridiculous gauntlet the FCC setup to leave public comments you can't come away from that with any other conclusion than that it was a deliberate attempt to choke and stifle public comment with a convoluted system you had to get through just to say anything. They've earned zero trust from us.

Comment Where's the proof? (Score 1) 205

After seeing the deliberately convoluted gauntlet you had to get through to leave a public comment - which is why Oliver set up gofccyourself.com to begin with - there's no reason any of us have to trust the FCC telling us this was a DDoS attack. As of this morning they've offered no proof. What's more likely is that after Oliver's show legitimate commenters used the tool to leave comments and flooded the site until it went down. The FCC wants the less informed public to see them as victims. All they're doing is blowing more smoke and running out the clock on public comment.

Comment WLB syndrome (Score 1) 520

The majority of those "outraged" are Trumpanzees defending their beloved leader. The whiny little bitches are just like fragile, delicate Trump that cries to Twitter every time someone hurts his widdle feelings. They trigger easily when their porcelain ego's are wounded, just like the Putin c**k holster in chief.

Comment Re: Trump Advisor Carter Page - Russian Agent (Score 1) 281

If that was supposed to be Ju Jitsu it was pathetic. Everyone in Washington "knows" Lindsey Graham is gay but he's been smart enough to both be very careful so there's no proof and get dirt on those that might expose him (Republicans still consider this a stoning offense). It's the same with Page. There's a ton of threads and trails that have made it clear to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that he's an agent of Russia but "proving it" would require very strong evidence and he and his handlers have been doing this for more than forty years. They know how to avoid leaving proof.

Comment Facts are not disputable (Score 1) 208

Everyone is acting as if an opinion of a fact IS a fact. No. Facts are facts period. If one person says something and there's video of them saying it then it's true. Period. Someone else or that same person saying "I didn't say that" or "no, I actually said this ____". Is not an alternate fact or a valid opinion or anything other than a lie. If Trump says his phones were tapped by Obama and there's zero evidence offered as proof that's not a "disputed" story, it's a f****** lie.

Slashdot Top Deals

Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. -- Henry David Thoreau

Working...