"Also now let's argue whether we adopt permanent summer time and winter time."
This is often where this whole thing can be derailed. The majority of people want to stop changing clocks, but they can't agree on which time to stick to.
Personally I'd keep it on DST permanently. We're already running on that clock for the vast majority of the year. We only use "standard" time for a little over 4 months. Where I live, 2 of those months have such short days that it is dark both morning and evening, so shifting the hours makes no difference. That leaves 2 months of the year where you could make an argument that standard time is the better choice, and even there much of it comes down to personal preference (ie. are you a morning person or not).
When Alberta, Canada put DST to a vote, the options were to abolish it and stay on daylight time permanently, or keep changing clocks. The main reason permanent daylight savings was chosen is that is what our west coast neighbours have provisionally chosen to do (though they're all waiting for one another to do it before they switch). A lobby emerged advocating the merits of standard time and the dangers of staying on daylight time. They even had some bogus research showing how Alberta should really be 2 time-zones over from where they'd end up. It was nonsense funded by a special interest group, but it worked. Despite almost everyone agreeing that changing the clocks needs to stop, the referendum failed because some people didn't get their preferred time zone.
Right before every clock change, there is a flood of people complaining that we should abolish this stupidity already. But if you ask them if they voted to abolish it in the referendum, many regretfully say no. They wish they had.