For some reason people can't seem to grasp that the I in AI is an emergent property, not a programmed behavior.
Yeah, that would be cool if AI chatbots were actual Artificial Intelligence and what you saw was an emergent property. But even though chatbots SOUND more intelligent that a vast segment of the population, they aren't intelligent, in the way that a true Artificial Intelligence would be. Also, you aren't seeing any kind of emergent property, it's a working prototype of an existing sound based communication framework called GGWave. There's even an Arduino library if you want your esp32 projects to all talk to each other using sound.
I'm not sure if this is any "emergent" behavior of ML, or if it is simply a part of the training data the ML model is making use of.
I was thinking the same thing. There had to be some prior training on the concepts or hacking, or even the simple fact that both the chess ML and the 'opponent' are enclosed systems that can be altered to change their actions.
Maybe you should shut up and learn about statistics.
I strongly suspect these researchers used the same methodology that was used successfully in WW2 to estimate the total number of German tanks based on the serial numbers of ones that had been captured or destroyed. Math works.
The unique identifier that YouTube uses for videos is a randomly generated 11 character string, there's no sequence, so you can't extrapolate.
"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt." -- a saying at RPI