Was already head on the 19th of September: dupe.

I've got bad news for you: all the banana you ever ate are fucked up. "Real" bananas with actual banana flavor called "Gros Michel" are practically extinct since the 1950, when they were wiped out by the banana blight. Nowadays, all you get is literal clones of the tasteless Cavendish.

The link you provide is a really bad example. Specifically it says In total, six vehicles passed the school bus while it was stopped., and Once stopped, the ADS-equipped vehicle contacted remote assistance with a prompt asking, “is this a school bus with active signals?” [...], a remote assistance agent located in Novi, Michigan, replied “No” to the prompt.

So first of all, 5 human drivers illegally passed the school bus during this specific incident, and the "autonomous" car was explicitly given the go ahead by a human, because the "autonomous" functions were uncertain how to proceed. By my counting, that's 6 bad drivers, all human.

What kind of weird tax write-off rules are those? I'd expect that if you spend $x million making (and possibly marketing) a thing, and then only get $y by selling/renting/... it, you'd write off ($x-$y), no matter if $y is exactly zero or just smaller than $x. What rule is is that requires the thing to be essentially destroyed?

The coreutils are surprisingly complex. If you know a little about kernel functions, it feels like any of those tools should basically map to just a single kernel call. The requirements of the POSIX-standard(s) that define how exactly the tools should work, including how they should handle and report errors, as well as limitations of filesystems (such as long filenames, unsupported characters, ACLs) make correct implementations quite a chore. I'm wondering if the rust implementations pass the test suite that's included in the gnu coreutils source. Does anyone here know?

Try the videos by Benn Jordan, who is in my opinion at least partially responsible for starting the anti-Flock-sentiment.

That may not be as smart an idea as you think, since there are a few code execution vulnerabilities in the OS. Not sure if any of them are remotely exploitable, of if any of those used by GamersNexus have been patched.

posting to undo incorrect moderation

replying to undo incorrect moderation.

If you're asking me, *positive* prices are a bigger problem. Actually having to pay for electricity is outrageous. Negative prices for a few hours on a few sunny days are negligible compared to the effect that positive prices have on the economy basically all year round.

The judgement apparently wasn't based on calculated risk due to long term low intensity exposure, but instead studies that show that pilots and flight attendants have a significantly higher risk of radiation-related cancer deaths than other professions.

That has already happened. Air Canada was found to be legally liable for information provided by their AI.

That's "high severity," as in e.g. code execution. Ghostscript is a candidate for code execution by just displaying a PDF or printing a postscript file. Ghostscript as an external filter for PS, PDF etc. may still be part of the default installation of ImageMagick on many Linux distributions.

You'll have to enter that prompt at https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgemini.google.com%2F and apparently you need to be logged in with a google account to actually take that practice test. Google search only returns the links you mentioned.

The quote here on slashdot is literally what's in the financial times article:

That indicates that the chip is 0.7 mm, but it makes no claim whatsoever about the antenna and potentially other electronics (e.g. capacitors) that may be included in the full device. I'd assume that the antenna covers the back of the entire label.