Racism among whites and the normalization of pedophilia represent two opposite sides of the political spectrum though. One is right-wing the other left.

Indians are caucasoid. Technically within "asia" but they are not except if you're being pedantic "asian" in common parlance... unless you're a UK news agency reporting on someone of Pakistani heritage.

Territory. Reducing random surprise encounters with other humans (violence, injury) in the wild I would assume.

Everything should be base 12. Anything else is just unnatural.

This hit the orhodox jewish community harder than anyone and as a group they are one of the wealthiest. It probably just boils down to lifestyle as much as anything.

That's as much politics as anything else. At the end of the day "sub-species" or even species can be a little arbitrary. It depends on where you draw the hard line on a spectrum of traits. See the for example the north american white tail, mule deer and blacktail deer. The common understanding of sub-species is little more than the common person's understanding of race but there are a ton of different definitions.

East Asians have the highest admixture with neanderthal followed by Europeans. It makes sense that given that the infection began in east asia and spread to western nations with more travel infrastructure that the virus would be optimized to target those populations.

Actually sub-saharan africans have admixture with some primitive now extinct forms of genus homo. There are some interesting publicans on this.

I've not seen any data indicating 33% admixture. Blacks with a history in the US that goes back to slavery have on average 1/5th (something like 22% maybe) admixture not 1/3 I believe.

This story was posted a few days ago and I doubt anyone will read this response but I'll go anyway. The article mentions that masks are better than nothing but does not quantify that. If it reduces infection by 1-5% for example but people no longer quarantine and are miling about more often this isn't even a negligible amount, it is destructive and contributes to infection. I quoted the part that wasn't the equivalent of editorializing or a snippit of a conclusion without context.

I've not been able to locate a single rigorous study that agrees with you on cloth masks Example: "A trial we conducted in Vietnam of 2-layered cotton cloth masks compared to medical masks showed a lower rate of infection in the medical mask group, and a 13 times higher risk of infection in the cloth mask arm (MacIntyre et al., 2015). The study suggests cloth masks may increase the risk of infection (MacIntyre et al., 2015), but may not be generalizable to all homemade masks. "

I'm curious what evidence you have for this. I'm not against masks but I've been searching and all the studies I've found haven't come to this conclusion.

My issue with the mask rules is that they don't mandate any kind of mask. If they at least set "surgical" mask as a minimum requirement it would make more sense but I've not seen any large scale studies that indicate influenza or covid to be impeded in a significant amount by these diy pretty cloth masks that people choose to wear. I mean, if I need to wear one ok but the reasoning is not more scientific than the requirement that I wear pants. It just seems like a comfort blanket or empty virtual signaling.

I'm not sure I like the idea of trademarking domain names. Doesn't this essentially lock that domain name for use with this company... forever? What happens if you buy a domain? Do you need to hire an attorney to verify no existing trademarks applied against it?

Why must this dross keep appropriating our culture?