Good question. I have no idea how difficult that would be. It would depend on how well-factored the disk access routines are from the other OS routines. You *can* reserve part of a Profile hard disk as a Pascal volume using a tool that comes with Apple Pasca, but I don't know if that's a file on a ProDOS volum, or how it works.
The MS-DOS p-system did apparently interoperable with the FAT filesystem, so it's possibly do-able?
Yeah, it would have to be an ARM-based Arduino, to use the Rust version. But there are several of those now, and they're not even necessarily more-expensive than the AVR versions.
Why in the world would you want a new interpreter for the Apple II? The one that exists is fine. And yes - people *have* done this before, mostly rather a long time ago. Building another version of the same thing isn't a bad thing, especially if it comes along with better documentation of the internals, in a way that's accessible to a modern audience.
Unsurprisingly, the 25-year-old project you refer to doesn't build on my system. And neither does the version Peter Miller updated way back in 2010. It's probably worth revisiting projects like this every decade or so.
Yes, with a caveat. Apple Pascal has some native 6502 routines as extensions to the standard UCSD Pascal. These will have to be translated, ideally to p-Code, and wired into something in the emulator. But I'd *like to* do that, once I have things up and running.
The new Freenet is written in Rust.
lol - same thing with pilots
Thank you!
You're very welcome
When the new Freenet is up and running, I think it will be the first system of any kind that could host something like wikipedia, not just the data but the wiki CMS system it's built on. An editable wikipedia, entirely decentralized and very scalable.
I think when the history of the last decade is written, it will be about - in part - the terrible social damage caused by opaque and biased social media algorithms manipulating the public discourse.
Locutus is primarily designed for decentralization, not anonymity - which will make it less suited to IP theft than various other technologies that are already pervasive, the same is true of a lot of the other "people you don't want to be your early adopters" that you mention. It's definitely a risk for systems like Freenet, but it's a manageable risk.
Not quite sure how reality will go for this project at least based on comments here so far
Most of the negative comments so far are from people who I doubt spent 20 seconds looking at our site, so I hope they don't color your judgement. Read through our user manual and form your own opinion.
Of course, the irony of using Youtube and Google Docs for the presentation kind of hurts.
Once there are viable alternatives on Freenet we'll use them.
I remember a few years back thinking how the promise of Freenet was so easy to achieve today between low power computers, cheap storage, and bandwidth... yet we are stuck with what we have.
I think the time is right, which is exactly why I'm doing what I'm doing
Totally agree about the importance of naming, and Freenet has the advantage of literally describing what we're building - a free network.
We've already had interest from everyone from video game developers who want to build a decentralized MMORPG, to political advocacy groups across the political spectrum. Plenty of people value freedom.
Fear is the greatest salesman. -- Robert Klein
