Comment Here is your chance, Slashdot! (Score 1, Interesting) 38
Nature abhors a vacuum.
Nature abhors a vacuum.
The idea of "emergent behavior" is nothing new and AI really isn't programmed in the traditional sense. It is more like teaching a child.
I've been doing software development for decades and the impact it is having on my work is eye opening. Yan Lecun is pretty sure we won't get to AGI with just the existing LLMs and I'm sure many other scientists agree with this, However, that is not to say the existing LLMs are turning out to be a failure. It is more we have to advance in other vectors as we have pretty much used up adding more data and compute to it.
And we know it can be done with less data and compute because human brains can do it.
I'm not surprised. Suddenly running off to chase squirrels is not without its risks. I'm at least looking for cars now. Many don't make it past this. Got to skew the numbers.
This is great for us in Canada.
I hate to be the cause of "Reductio ad Hitlerum", but back in the 1930, someone said "Hitler is my best friend. He shakes all the trees and I collect all the apples".
Me: Tries to post news link.
Facebook: We see you are in Australia. The website requires a fee of $0.10 to post this on Facebook. Can we charge this to your credit card?
Me: No
Facebook: Link not posted.
Mod the above up!
Having said that, it seems humans are investing a lot on Dark Matter and Dark Energy research.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.popsci.com%2Farticle...
I think you are mixing some unrelated information here
While it is the most common element in the universe - hydrogen is extremely rare in our atmosphere - because it escapes into space by floating to the top and being subject to solar winds.
Free Hydrogen is rare, sure. Some of this blows away but the real problem for free Hydrogen is that it just loves to bond with other elements. We have a lot of Hydrogen on earth simply because it is all bonded to other stuff.
Make hydrogen into a major growing aspect of our economy, and it WILL escape over time proportional to that.
The problem with that is that unless we're using something other than water to do that, then, well, we're losing water from the water cycle every time we do that. That's essentially how Mars died, by a very similar method of losing its water to solar winds.
We are not setting hydrogen free, Hydrogen is the fuel that generally combines with oxygen to give us energy and water. I guess there could be a leak in whatever you are storing the hydrogen in but having enough leaks that we have to worry about the Earth losing too much Hydrogen seems pretty implausible.
More than that even - we also free up oxygen with that process. You know the other half of the oxygen cycle, right? Carbon dioxide.
How did carbon get into this discussion? Carbon dioxide is a byproduct of burning carbon based fuels. You breath in oxygen, combine it with the (carbon) food you eat and breath out carbon dioxide. Now I guess you might be thinking, "We break water into hydrogen and oxygen, save the hydrogen for fuel, and let the oxygen go into the atmosphere. However, when you then burn the Hydrogen, you combine it with free oxygen. It all balances out. There is no net addition of oxygen to the atmosphere.
Every option has costs - we have to use resources to live, and entropy is in all directions - but some options can lead to much worse outcomes if we stop caring about the future.
Entropy only goes in one direction. I guess what you are saying is that net entropy will increase no matter what we do. I agree with that. However, unless your concern is about slowing down the ultimate heat death of the universe, I'm not sure why you would care about entropy in this context.
That's why basic research is crucially important, not just marketing and economic research. But again - that requires caring about the future, and that's also something that's been lost with the generations in power for recent decades.
The power of the economy means nothing without a future to expand into. That requires clear vision based on repeatable truths. Runaway destruction only requires ignoring those truths in favor of an illusion of infinite gain - an illusion
that robs us as a people of everything.
Ryan Fenton
It is great you are thinking about the future. More people should. But using excess energy to split water molecules so that we can combine the hydrogen and oxygen later to get that energy back seems like a good idea (if you can make the storing of hydrogen safe, of course).
I used to put a quarter in Asteroids, build up about 25 ships and sell them to the next player for a quarter. Seniors aren't discovering video games, gamers are becoming seniors.
I don't mean to be throwing shade an you l33t young'ns but we are the GOAT!
I can just see the first class folks spinning in their seats. Imagine the row behind when you look up and some person with crazy goggles is peering back at you.
I predict 360 content will be removed after the first few weeks.
What I found amusing is that a tech article found it necessary to explain what 79% is:
To put this in a plainer fashion, for every single processor sold by Intel, AMD sold four
I'm disappointed in the direction Slashdot comments have gone over the years but there is only so much the Slashdot editors can do working today's "high tech" articles.They have my sympathy.
The connections of this thread back to politics seemed to be the typical illogical jump in Slashdot comments. Then I remember those "Giant Meteor" bumper stickers from the US presidential election saying to "Just end it already".
It is clearly a political issue. Please carry on with the insightful commentary as I'm still undecided in this latest poll.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FGiant-M...
No doubt the intelligent and insightful postings counteract this Twitter effect.
"Float like a jelly bird? Let's go right now!" - Famous movie line.
This is what my cat thought his name was. He refused to answer to any other name.
"Out of register space (ugh)" -- vi