Comment Unsurprising (Score 1) 30
It took me a whack of tries in Luner Lander on that mainframe in '73 even with a simplified simulation. Working with a dumb terminal didn't help.
It took me a whack of tries in Luner Lander on that mainframe in '73 even with a simplified simulation. Working with a dumb terminal didn't help.
AI product doesn't qualify for copyright, isn't that the legal standard.
sand blasting the ablative shielding of rockets on the way into orbit before corrosive clouds forming to sandblast the paint off planes flying through them and diamond rain falling to strip the land of anything made of material softer than diamonds.
Are the industries really green if they devices are not recyclable?
Or did we pass by them? Maybe they were just lounging around in their underwear and we blew past them like a banshee trying to catch up to the wild hunt.
If AI created content can't be copyrighted, does that mean that nothing created by an Iphone, or as it this instance "generative AI in products like Photoshop." I am guessing this hasn't been legally tested but seems like something that could be argued in a court case.
It is a good thing I am not a lawyer so I can get away with such a stupid question.
I didn't pirate that picture it was in the public domain....
Iphones use AI in their camera apps, don't they?
If you don't know how or why the model comes up with what it comes up with you can't reveal it to anyone else. Perhaps I am not understanding correctly -- wouldn't be the first time. I suppose you can release the initial program but once it has started to do its thing with the training data it becomes pretty much a black box, doesn't it?
I toggled Windows off. I also bought a mac mini.
"The first number to be proven transcendental without having been specifically constructed for the purpose of proving transcendental numbers' existence was e, by Charles Hermite in 1873." https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
It was literally the first alternative mentioned in the GP
Any irrational number will do. How about e or root 2? I bet the 105 trillionth digit of 1/3 is 3 but I'd like to see you prove it. OK you can probably do that without actually doing the calculation since it is a repeating decimal.
I guess they must be set free from their illegal captivity. Habeas corpus!
Why are you trying to connect it to a modern one in the first place? There must be one that still works or could be repaired sitting in a barn or recycle shop.
You can freeze to death on a mountain, but getting hurtled high above them with out so much as a sniffle?
I haven't come across that particular shrine yet but did you notice that the parts of the bridge that were submerged came up aut of the lava without a liberal coating of solidified magma? Anyways it is all just fantasy make believe and doesn't bear much scrutiny.
seeing as how he is a poorly designed robot himself!
From what I see the only people who actually like steam are the people who never knew a world without it. Sure there are benefits to having a centralized place to buy games but it comes with a 30% markup and invasive data mining policies. I managed to avoid steam for a good 10-15 years before bowing to inevitability.
I wonder why if Steam wants to tout LINUX compatibility they don't provide a LINUX native client? Why does it still depend on a third party Windows compatibility layer?
Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.