Comment Re:What does HubSpit do again? (Score 4, Informative) 15
We use Hubspot. Here's what we use it for:
- the "live chat with support person" bubble on our web application
- single funnel for incoming/outgoing support tickets & support communications with our customers
Adopting it was an old decision.
We would love to not use hubspot; the service delivered vs. the ongoing costs seem like a bad deal now.
At some point, we'll get around to migrating to something else.
Comment So many options... (Score 1) 107
The time change induces stress and literally kills people. Not changing time might make northerners depressed from lack of morning light...
You know what? We have artificial lighting and spend most of our time indoors anyway. Encourage broad spectrum home and office lighting and use UTC with a fixed local longitudinal adjustment.
Comment Re:Summary ... (Score 3, Insightful) 107
Permanent ST is more closely aligned with circadian biology, although earlier dusk may limit some evening activities
You know what's aligned even more with circadian biology?
Keep the current system, get up off your ass, and change your clocks twice per year without whinging like a precious snowflake.
That way you you don't have to deal either with the sun beating down on you while you try to sleep at 4am or with your poor children getting run over in the dark on their way to school.
Sure, a couple of codgers might keel over in march, but they were probably gonna die soon anyway. It's much harder to measure the statistics of all the other people who would die steadily throughout the year due to the aforementioned issues, as well as similar problems caused by a static clock that doesn't adjust at all to when the sun actually rises. However, I would bet good money that it would add up to far more casualties overall.
For some reason, I seem to be in a small minority on this issue, though. It's probably because everybody would rather believe in a solution to the problems of living on a tilted axis that's clear, simple, and wrong.
Comment Re:New Business/Health Plan (Score 1) 62
Comment Re:New Business/Health Plan (Score 3) 62
rich people are not psychopaths
Being a psychopath/sociopath is a key ingredient in getting rich. Generally some opportunity had to come along that required a disregard for the welfare or fairness to others. A lot of folks stepped away from an opportunity because they didn't think it was right, but a wealthy person likely seized upon some such occurances.
Comment Re:Radios? (Score 1) 26
Looks like the "radi" part of the name came from "radiation", as in "blast waves and other high-energy events radiate", and "oss" came from "ossature", the French word for framework, skeleton, or structure.
Not really much to do with ham radio.
Comment Re:Not Flock (Score 1) 124
My wife's brother became a policeman and turned from being a regular person into a judgemental prick with a bad attitude about hispanics.
Police get conditioned into being bad police by all the other bad police.
Comment Naming things what they are (Score 2) 18
From TFS: "Some companies in Denmark have access to the CPR for verifying people's information with the government"
So the people's data was being used as an authentication token.
That is as bad a design as you could possibly come up with.
Comment Re:I bet you could reclaim even more (Score 1) 70
Thanks for the info, I will never buy a Mac due to incompatibility issues
It's not incompatible. It's locked out by the vendor's use of anti consumer cryptography.
Comment Re: IANAL, but... (Score 1) 88
Right⦠because EVERYBODY fully reads and understands the TOCs of every service they useâ¦
People don't read a lot of things that they agree to, especially if it's 20,000 words in a postage stamp-sized text box on the new toy they just turned on. However, anybody who's not an idiot realizes that most everything in an agreement that they haven't read is against their interests, and plans accordingly. I personally always look for binding arbitration agreements and make sure to opt out of those whenever possible.
Oddly enough, the Anthropic TOS and privacy policy actually aren't all that obtuse and can be skimmed in a few minutes. They make it clear that they'll be looking for problems with what you upload and what kinds of problems those might be. Like I said, you can easily avoid all that by using a paper notebook for your diary.
Comment Re:Tax break = taxpayer paying for water and power (Score 1) 54
Comment Re: Directionally Right, Specifically Wrong. (Score 1) 160
That nightmare scenario actually did play out not long ago near me. A woman from out of state was falsely ID'd by an AI camera of some kind and was detained for months and it wrecked her life.
My sentiment is that the process was wrong and that the officers and other parties involved in this should all be fired, and the woman compensated.
None of that is what normally happens; that is not happening "millions of times". That's why it was newsworthy when it _did_ happen.
Comment Re: Oracle PeopleSoft seems like the Need SSN just (Score 1) 17
It's hard to believe that a Jordanian teenager learned the PeopleSoft vendor integration API well enough to exploit it.
Probably somebody whose dayjob is related.
Maybe he was just Vibesploiting, but it seems less likely.
Comment Re: Directionally Right, Specifically Wrong. (Score 1) 160
The original comment was philosophically open ended.
I made the example in my response very specific because arguing about hypothetical generalities is usually not productive.
The difference is this: it's difficult to ascertain if someone is guilty or innocent without arresting them. YOu don't arrest people via a random statistical sampling; you arrest via a biased selector: You arrest people you have high odds of beleiving are likely to be guilty. And you arrest them because you cannot ascertain their guilt via non-destructive observation. Without arresting them, they are allowed to simply walk away while you are trying to ascertain their status.
An arrest rate of 10% of all humans would be ridiculous.
A false positive rate of 10% _among the population of people you arrest_ is acceptable.
So the applicable comparison isn't "your cell phone doesn't work 10% of the time", the applicable comparison is "when your cell phone wasn't working, the tech support team guessed correctly as to the root cause 90% of the time, but guessed incorrectly 10% of the time"
IOW, 90% success rate with a 10% FP rate amongst a problematic cohort.
>No I maintain it would be pathetic performance by LEO if they were willy nilly arresting people hoping to bag the perp.
Nobody is advocating for that.
The cops should only be arresting people they have a plausible reason to arrest. If it turns out that 10% of the time their guess was incorrect, that's acceptable. They are not performing random arrests and getting a lot hit rate. They are doing targeted arrests and getting an ultra high hit rate.