Comment Re: Is it just my Alzheimer's? (Score 1) 16
Are you saying that if I ask AI what Tesla would have thought about new tsunami wave observations, it will hallucinate what the NY Times would say?
Are you saying that if I ask AI what Tesla would have thought about new tsunami wave observations, it will hallucinate what the NY Times would say?
If AI is so unusable because all it does is hallucinate, as I've learned from slashdot, why is the NY Times concerned?
Is it hard to imagine how an old man might post a thought and then think of something to add, but slashdot has no editing posts feature?
"Two gauges didnâ(TM)t line up with tsunami predictions from earlier seismic and geodetic source models â" one recorded the waves earlier than expected, and the other recorded them later."
Since some readers get butthurt if I post ChatGPT responses, shall I leave as an exercise for the reader to ask ChatGPT how Tesla would interpret these observations?
Was Tesla vindicated?
Publication date November 23, 1995
How come neural networks alone couldn't do context sensitivity before the attention mechanism, which isn't a neural network, came along? Why can't the attention mechanism's weights actively learn?
Why does me getting the AI to format responses to certain posts that I choose in a way that renders cleanly on slashdot, why does that trigger you?
ChatGPT said:
---
First, I did not cite ChatGPT as an authority, I raised an ethical and methodological question. Those are not the same thing. Second, it is simply false that we have no partial or complementary human-relevant models for lymphatic transport, immune signaling, and particle migration. They may not be perfect substitutes, but neither are mice. The claim that only a whole-animal kill can answer this class of question is exactly what is being contested.
And the idea that my LLM query will kill more mice than this experiment did is rhetorical, not scientific. If animal use is justified, it should be defended on necessity and proportionality, not on deflection or speculation about indirect causality.
---
Or maybe climate change?
Was Mengele just doing hard science too?
"For overt brutality, perhaps not so great."
Does it make sense that if you're exposed at an early age, you might learn not to be bullied by words on the internet?
What about "No Regerts" (sic)?
Can I mix in my own responses as I see fit, or does freedom scare you?
Why ignore porn employment?
Did we find the megalomaniac?
Frankly, Scarlett, I don't have a fix. -- Rhett Buggler