Triggered, coward?

That was the funny part. All you've done here is proven you don't understand humor, and been cowardly.

When exactly did you become a simp? Why are you proud of that?

Your ranting and rambling only makes sense on that basis.

That's one reason, but there is also that the execs and managers want to look busy.

Advertisers.

As long as we keep arguing about it, they will keep posting it, because social media is about increasing engagement to sell ads.

Hahahhahaaha

Point to where I said we should stop using all fossil fuels cold turkey, you clown-ass clown.

We also transplanted a worm into the brain of a former heroin addict and current fascist's butthole addict, and he is now in charge of health.

Oh shit this is precious AF, keep going with your absolute proof that your reading comprehension skills are shit.

A real lightweight could get quite tipsy on a single Big Little Thing tall boy, 19.2 oz, 9.5% ABV. They're like four bucks at my local grocery outlet, too.

I used to have a fairly unfortunately serious drinking habit, but I've scaled back, and one of these gets me a nice buzz on. And I'm a big dude.

I also genuinely enjoy IPAs, while I would generally rather not drink a Pilsener and despise sours. But I'm not mad at people who want to drink those other beers, and a lot of people think an IPA tastes like Pine-Sol. People should let people like things, yeesh.

It's a formerly very common slang word in English, which you wouldn't know about, Ivan. Thanks for outing yourself, though. I honestly appreciate it.

The money "the industry" puts down for decommissioning never covers the cost and we always have to make up the difference.

Lives are saved, and lives are lost. But more importantly and validly than doing the math on the net, we should talk about whether we have alternatives now. For some purposes, no. For most purposes, yes. Therefore we can reduce our use of fossil fuels, and we should, because it will save still more lives. The debate is not over whether we ever should have started burning fossil fuels, because we could not have gotten here without them. It's about how quickly we can and should stop.

The health system is a problem, the diet is a problem, but the pollution is also a problem. Pretending it is not is literally insane, and it benefits no one except the owners and investors of the fossil fuel industry — and even for them there are significant negative effects.

Here's where I found out I hated the author:

Yeah, it's working, so he should stop it? Man, fuck that fucking fuck. More importantly though, that sentence proves conclusively that he should not stop it, because it's working. In short, the very same thing the author says before the above-quoted turd.

Tell me you read things into the comment that I didn't write without telling me.

There's no planet B.

I see you didn't RTFA.