Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Inevitable collapse (Score -1) 213

Actually only 37% of the British electorate voted for Brexit, vs. 34% who voted to remain. This is why it's important to vote, otherwise you end up like the remaining 29% who woke up the next morning and started frantically Googling various wordings of "Wut is Brexit?"

So probably at least 6 out of 10 potential voters in the UK would readily admit that Brexit was a mistake.

The numbers you cited mean that 66% of Brits supported Brexit - those who voted yes, and those who, by abstaining from voting, decided to stand behind whatever decision is made by those who did vote.

Comment Re:Social, not economic (Score -1) 67

Insane pivot to extreme politicization of US politics. Thanks, we need more of it. I think intense politicization of everything is going to make America great again.

The ones responsible for politicization are the ones driving their political brainwashing into other people's entertainment, not the ones calling them out.

Comment Re:Very interesting (Score -1) 47

Only 5 years ago 97% of international trade used the US Dollar, so far this year it's 70%. Belt & Road has eaten the IMF/World Bank programs throughout the Third World.

This is the one potentially lasting permanent damage that Trump will have caused. US power has been supported worldwide in no small part by the strength and universal acceptance of the US dollar. Trump has already destroyed that hegemony at least partially. It took world wars and fortuitous positioning by the US across a century to build up that hegemony, and almost overnight Trump has severely weakened that power. It wouldn't be surprising if that power never returned, as no president post-Trump will be able to correct that huge mistake.

LOL, so you believe that were it not for Trump, Russia would have responded to sanctions by sulking in corner instead of developing alternatives, or China would be content to pay the dollar tax indefinitely? Russia started developing their alternative to SWIFT during Osama's reign, when the idea of cutting them off SWIFT was first floated after 2014 (when noone even heard of Trump yet), andwere already prepared to make the switch when the euroleftists along with senile Bidet in 2023 managed to finally gather their courage and do the deed, with no Trump being involved. China in the meantime has been positioning itself to replace USA as a global power since the moment they abandoned communism and adopted red-flag-waving-capitalism. And if you think Bidet or Karen Harris would have pulled some ace out of their sleeve to stop them - I have a nice bridge to sell to you at a bargain price.

Comment Re:Missing the point (Score -1) 33

Then invest in inverse ETFs, they're the best tool if you're oh-so-sure of the "tomorrow to 10 years absolutely max" timeframe. What, you don't want to retire to a private island after 10 years? Except of course you know perfectly well that the timeframe actually is "...or never" and that is the most likely possibility, and are just talking shit.

Wonder what pathetic excuse you're gonna use next? :DDDD

Comment Re:Missing the point (Score -1) 33

This is true. Anyone who wants to use stable coins that have the deep capital backing and reliability of large banks and major countries will use the preexisting ones. Theyre called the dollar and the euro. The people who want “alternative” online assets will utilize trumpcoins and whatever equivalent shows up in the European market. The really stupid thing is when these alternative assets inevitably crash, all these libertarian anti-gubbermint dumbasses in the ecosystem will scream for a bailout from the very governments that they were so keen to loudly hate on and avoid. And theyll almost certainly get it. Thus, the end result is that idiots are largely immune from the consequences of their actions, and wealth ultimately is transferred from taxpayers into the pockets of the cryptobros who stood up the coins and skimmed their millions or billions off the top. I will continue to avoid the entire scammy ecosystem like its Ebola.

Put your money where your mouth is, I dare you, go put some shorts on Bitcoin. After all it'll "inevitably crash" and then you'll strike it rich! But you're just talking bull, know perfectly well that if you do so you'll just loose that money, and I know it, you know it, I know that you know it, etc. Oh, I know, cue some excuse on how you're "too moral" to fleece those cryptobros that you hate so much, right?

Comment Re: Propoganda -LOL (Score -1) 173

You're absolutely right. In fact this process should be streamlined, we should establish some sort of a trustworthy institution that would decide which statements are true and allowed, and which are misinformation to be removed from public space. Hmmmm, what should we call it? The Ministry of Truth perhaps?

Don't know about you, but I'd rather live with some unnecessary covid deaths than in a fucking Orewllian dystopia.

Comment Re:I think it is a shame.. (Score -1) 69

However, I'd like to ask you what, if anything, you've ever done for your country or have you just held out your hand hoping your government would drop money into it?

Once you realize it is the governments of the world that cause tribalism, and pit us against each other, you will realize what a folly it was to go to war so some politicians and can win over some other politicians. Sorry if that upsets you, but the stupidest thing you can be is patriotic. Even in America, we are far from free, and far from the sort of men who went to war over a 1% tax on tea. Our governments own us. They are in control, and we cant do shit about it. They are evil, regardless of which side of the aisle you think your side has the moral high ground. You are wrong. No peoples want to harm you, no peoples want to take what is yours. Just governments do (unless you are Palestinian, and there are Israelis around). I commend your bravery for going to fight, just not the wits you used to decide to do it for some shitty politicians. They are all shitty. All of them.

OK, so splendid isolation, Fortress America, dare I say America First, we should stop getting involved in military conflicts which do not involve us? Including Ukraine? Or are you just a typical leftist "being involved in any wars is evil, except of course for the ones I support" hypocrite?

Comment Re:Minimum specs on Steam are clear, and pretty lo (Score -1) 65

"minimum spec" for a game isn't supposed to mean "technically runs but no one will actually be willing to play it that way"

Maybe not in your opinion, but it has always meant that, and always will. Marketing departments are a thing.

No, that's stupid marketing. Sensible marketing is supposed to increase your profits, this will only generate lots of refunds.

Comment Re:Not a realistic portrayal of AI's capabilities (Score -1) 86

but might not know the exact syntax or the exact API signature

In other words, a search engine*.

*In the times of yore before ads buggered them all up.

If you know of a search engine that's can search Stack Overflow, auto-paste the snippet into appropriate place in my code, auto-adjust it for my context (replacing generic variable names with my own, etc.), not respond with some variant of "RTFM/STFW/you shouldn't be doing that, I, a random guy on Internet know better than you what you want to do/question irrelevant/offtopic" half of the time, all in a workflow integrated into the IDE that takes about 5 seconds and does NOT break my coding flow unlike the alt-tabbing/searching/etc. then I'm all ears.

Comment Re:You don’t like government handouts? (Score -1) 94

Tax subsidies - not taking as much tax from a company as you otherwise would - is not the same as giving them other people's tax dollars.

No, but the effect is the same. If I don't collect $500 M from the fossil fuel companies, that money has to be made up somehow. It's not giving them other people's tax dollars but it's raising everyone else's tax burden to make up for it.

Not saying it is good or bad, just that it is a thing and is not specific to the fossil fuel industry.

True, I hear tax breaks for the asbestos and lead-paint industries are equally as beneficial to our national health. "We've always done it this way and the companies are very happy about it." is not a reason to continue funding environmental disasters.

What's next? You will defend oil spills as a way to create jobs cleaning up the coast? The Valdez oil spill and Deepwater Horizon were great ways to inject government dollars into the economy?

OK, so if I delude myself into thinking you owe me 1 billion $, then "graciously" allow you not to pay it, I have subsidised you for 1 billion?

Comment Re:Projections for 75 years from now... (Score -1) 121

I know it is easy to dismiss.

A few years ago my mother complained about the government "wasting" money on research into ocean algae / plankton die-offs. I had to explain to her that ocean algae and plankton generate an estimated 50-80% of the oxygen on the planet and if they die off we all might have a big problem breathing.

No, the oxygen you breathe is generated by the food you eat while it's growing. If you somehow magically isolated off oceans, forests, just kept our farms on our side of that barrier. It's a closed loop, we'd still be ok. Every single molecule of oxygen you breathe in and use is used to burn organic matter, and the plant that fixated that carbon into said organic matter released exactly the same amount of oxygen in process.

Comment Re:Global warming (Score 0) 121

Mosquitos. They LOVE warm weather and the nastiest of the nasty little critters are moving northward. They've packed their bags full of tropical diseases. As one little feller was heard to exclaim when arriving in Michigan with his mosquito family: Wheee!! We're here!!!

Which means that there will be bigger pressure and maybe finally the greenie assholes will stop vetoing any measures designed to deal with the problem and eradicate the fing bugs. We have techniques to do that, like the gene drive or sterilized males, we just need to ignore greenie crying and actually *use* them. But hopefully, it's quite different when a greenie asshole can go "oh but we need to protect mosquito species, and malaria is a problem those plebes in poor countries can deal with". Personally going through a bout of malaria (rather than just watching African children in TV) has this habit of suddenly making greenies rational.

We have the tools, we just need to *use* them. And we don't even need to eradicate *ALL* mosquito species, just the disease-carrying ones. I can assure you that the non-malaria ones can fulfill their environmental role just as well.

Slashdot Top Deals

Your own mileage may vary.

Working...