I'm joining AI doomerism on the side of doom. There is no legitimate purpose for plains apes.

...yes, people still use textbooks

talking about the priorities of an organization which is mostly symbolic except for the security commission, aka the US doesn't need to care what you think club, is pretty silly

the purpose of the democratic party is to absorb criticism, they're a propaganda wing of the fascist uniparty

except you can't put that in a textbook

I am both disappointed and proud to be the first person on slashdot to take this seriously. Accurate maps are important because the whole point of sticking with the old shitty projections is literally minimizing Africa. Why does this website have so many racists on it?

Gosh, I wonder why we'd need to make a law against behaving like Homo Economicus in a free-market system. I can't think of anything you could do to a free-market system that might cause that sort of problem.

old: dead internet theory

bold: dead internet mandate

No. No, no, no. Oh my god. You're doing the same thing the idiot in the article is. Those rules are beyond the capability of a Turing machine. You can't make them rigorous enough to not have holes. That was Asimov's point.

It's worse than that. Asimov's whole point was "you can't do that with just a Turing machine." I'm pretty sure there are ways to build something more interesting than a token-predictor, but there are zero people with that much money who are interested in doing so.

Verdict: *very loud incorrect buzzer*

There's no reason to port Doom to stupid new things ever again.

an article advocating for better working conditions that you can hear Claude's cadence in, truly a masterpiece

You seem to have missed the past couple decades of Supreme Court bullshit. If you're within 100 miles of a physical border, the fourth amendment doesn't exist.

The guy whose job is to be wrong is chilly on AI.

please form a line at the guillotine