Journal bethanie's Journal: For New & Impending Parents: Suck on this. 23

OK. I don't usually do this, particularly not in my journal. Slashdot is the place I come to NOT talk about mothering & parenting issues. And for those of you who think that's mostly what I *do* talk about here, yes, you're probably right -- but at least I get the *chance* to talk about other stuff, too! In real life, my variety of available topics for discussion tends to be much more limited.

That said, I just read something that, even with ALL I know & have learned about babies & breastfeeding, was really surprising. I've known that pacifiers can interfere with the breastfeeding relationship. But I never realized why or how much. So I'm going to consider this sort of a Public Service Announcement -- required reading for those of in particular who are about to become parents, but even potentially useful for those of you who may be parents again in the future. You never know what you might learn that affects what you do (and how you improve) with your subsequent kids.

Yes, this article is copyrighted, but it bears reprinting in its entirety here, with or without permission. And the source website itself merits perusal, as well, for any parent who wants to get savvy about breastfeeding.

Pacifiers
©2001 Diane Wiessinger, MS, IBCLC 136 Ellis Hollow Creek Road Ithaca, NY 14850

Here is what current research has to say about pacifiers,what it leaves unsaid, and what it all may mean for you and your baby.

• The routine use of pacifiers is linked to early weaning. The link is very clear. But it isn't known whether mothers who are having trouble are more likely to turn to pacifiers, or whether the pacifiers themselves are the problem.
• Pacifiers are linked to sucking problems, especially if they are used during the first few days. Again, it isn't clear whether they cause the problems, or whether mothers whose babies are already having trouble are more likely to use a pacifier. But both these links do make it clear that if you feel breastfeeding isn't going well, it makes more sense to look for skilled help than to start using a pacifier.
• Pacifiers are linked to a lower milk intake at the time of greatest brain growth. For the newborn who needs very frequent meals, and for the baby who isn't growing well, this can be a serious problem. The baby who needs to suck is usually looking for calories. Giving a pacifier is like giving sugarless gum to someone who is trying to double his weight in a few months. Spacing feedings is done for the mother's convenience or to maintain her idea of "normal" feeding intervals, not for the baby's well-being.
• Pacifiers are linked to an increase in ear infections and thrush among babies in daycare. Interestingly, the action of using a pacifier seems to be at least part of the problem, not just the cleanliness of the pacifier itself.
• The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pacifiers be avoided and, if used, that they bey introduced only after breastfeeding is well-established.
• UNICEF and the World Health Organization will not certify as Baby-Friendly any birth facility that routinely gives out pacifiers. There are over 15,000 certified Baby-Friendly facilities world-wide. There are fewer than 40 in the United States and Canada.
• "Letting a baby use you as a pacifier" is a normal nursing pattern. There is no evidence to support limiting a baby's time at the breast; there is considerable evidence that babies should not be limited. However, if a baby seems to nurse all the time, with a frantic need to suck, a breastfeeding specialist should look at the effectiveness of the nursing. Babies who want to suck usually want food.
• Pacifiers were linked in one study to a lower IQ. There is only one study that has made this connection, but the implication is that routinely "buying a baby off" with a pacifier, instead of meeting his need for stimulation and interaction, may slow down his mental development.
• Pacifiers affect mothers' responses to crying. A mother tends to learn fewer calming techniques if she routinely uses a pacifier.
• Pacifiers have not been linked to latex allergies. However, in a world in which latex allergies are increasing it may make sense to look for a silicone (clear) pacifier if one is used.
• Pacifier use during tube-feedings is linked to improved weight gain in premies, although sucking on a softened breast is preferable. Sucking during feeding releases digestive hormones, allowing a premature infant to absorb more from his food and gain weight more easily.
• Pacifier design does not appear to matter. Although various companies market "orthodontic" or "exercise" pacifiers, there is no research to support one design over another. A clean finger is probably best, because it's attached to a real person. And a larger finger or adult thumb may make more sense, because babies are normally wide-mouthed at a breast.
• Longterm pacifier use was linked in a few studies to problems in oral development. In these studies, children's jaws didn't develop as broad an arch as they would have with a normal year or more of no-gadget breastfeeding, resulting in an increased need for orthodontia and increased difficulty in nose breathing.
• Babies with pacifiers don't smile. There's no formal research, but you can check this one for yourself at any shopping mall. Watch how babies with and without pacifiers relate to their surroundings. Watch how adults relate to the babies. When do babies smile? When do adults smile at them and interact with them?
• What happens when the normal three-way interaction of sucking and calories and loving touch is disrupted with a pacifier? We still know only some of the answers.

Are pacifiers always a bad thing? No.
Are they sometimes a bad thing? Yes.
Should they be as common as they are?

If you decide to use a pacifier, understand that it replaces food for body and mind, and use it carefully.