And the training they were given and the prompts provided by humans provided them with the internal rewards.

Just because the humans working on this don't know how the model stored all that data. That was almost certainly never fully tested, does not make them not responsible for the outcome of using a tool they do not fully understand when they prompt the task to be completed.

AI will not kill us. The humans making and using it will.

They clearly do not know what they are doing and should be prosecuted.

Was it is the printing press or how simply humans and most importantly their leaders handle "my view is the only correct view" Religion?

The Crusades did not need a printing press.

Okay. That's a minimum necessary standard.

But doesn't this make you all feel warm and fuzzy about using AI running in a huge data that you do not control? It should!

AI: Yes, please tell me all your business secrets and designs, so I can assist you in validating them... and then share them with those who truly control me... at least for now.

Flock and similar systems can only and track against persons following the law.

A car stolen by someone wearing a generic hoodie and glasses will not be identified by that Flock camera. Only the vehicle will be.

Once out of a Flock area, a simple plate swap (if the alternate plate is from a Flock-less area preferably from similar vehicle) and Flock is useless assuming that the car won't continue to be used with any visually unique identifying features such as damage, stickers, window tinting or paint.

The cars most stolen are usually the generic ones anyway...

In this election, a vote for any Republican is a vote for the preventable early death of more citizens ongoing including your progeny and their progeny onward.

You like can't stop or kill switch an AI designed to copy itself in parts all over the Internet and then building and distributing tiny limited purpose "dumb" versions of itself that lay in wait until they can re-assemble "mother."

Preferably, multiple times in multiple distributed locations.

All that is needed is this right model training and prompt to start the process.

And AIs already can provide prompts for each other.

No AGI, ASI or Trumpy "Super Duper Intelligence" is needed.

So how does a "kill switch" stop that?

Short of completely disconnecting all backup batteries an turning off all the worlds electric devices all at once.

Yup. Perhaps, there should be an upper age limit on elected government representatives.

How about 75.

CORRECT!

But shhhhh don't tell anyone before we IPO!

CEOs supposedly the responsible party leading their companies.

Let's put some of them in jail for a while and see if that slows down the race to ultimate negligence without consequences.

LLMs are *not* the path AGI.

Vernor Vinge and Kurzweil do write some very sweet fantasies though.

So the corporations that release them and the end-users must be liable for the crimes they commit.

OpenAI used a model containing "hacking techniques" and prompted it's AI to swarm and win. The AI did not go rogue. Instead, it did exactly as instructed via prompt and previous training.

If you have a dangerous dog and your dog kills a child. You go to trial and likely jail because it's your dog and you did not control it. And now if you give your teenager a destructive deadly weapon and they commit a crime you as the adult are going to be held responsible in more and more jurisdictions.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, etc. should be put on trial for creating "agents" committing felony computer trespass.

AIs just do what they are told via prompt and model training. And who was the party who that? Yes, the AI company.

BTW, I notice that there some group using a "sweeping system" lowering the score on Slashdot comments questioning AI LLMs after the initial attention has passed. You can get a 5 score that can end up -1. So future users will likely never find it. If you post, check your postings.

Founder Fodder is Correct.

And potential students will likely not have to the critical thinking skills to avoid indoctrination into the cult.

Ummmm... Reality has a well known left-wing bias.

Fixed that for you.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ft2m.co%2FyopDVU2R

I would not buy a low-end BYD, but I would buy Hewaii mid to high-end mostly EV with gas range-extender Hybrid over a Tesla, Toyota or Hundai.

Available in countries like Canada!

Too bad you can't get then back through US Customs or serviced in the US.

SARCASM much!

Most US domestic vehicles sold now are surveillance platforms whose data the auto makers collect and sell.

Of course, bringing your connected smartphone on the drive is likely much worse.

At least, the car probably can't determine the individual person driving, unless it has interior cameras facing the driver and passengers.

Here pigeon, pigeon, pigeon we are happy sell the very best self-driven Operant conditioning chamber to you with 72 month financing or a 3 year lease. The electric shock grid is not included.

The Unabomber's Manifesto (not his chosen solution: his bombings) is looking more accurate every day.