I'm guessing you are employed by one of those fossil-fuel burning, carbon-spewing peaker plants.
That's a bad guess from an antinuclear idiot. The fossil fuel industry funded the antinuclear movement. Methane companies love renewables because they can charge peaking prices every night.
It to highlight the fact that nuclear is not the 100% 24/7 operation you nuclear advocates like to think it is.
Nuclear is 24/7 for 18 straight months. You can like that is a bad thing. Meanwhile solar never can't get close to 24 hours and wind has gaps of weeks to months every year with little production.
intertia
Yes. Grid inertia is a major issue that often goes ignored by antinuclear dweebs. Most people are incapable of understanding the concept. In fact most people don't understand electricity. It's kind of crazy the number of people who think solar works at night. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Even though you point to the need for nuclear power in addition to wind and solar you should expect accusations of opposing renewable energy
I'm used to it at this point. It's really a form of psychological projection. They oppose nuclear so they assume we oppose solar and wind. The math is my side. All they have is lies and half-truths.
Rooftop solar is especially expensive for all kinds of reasons.
It's affordable here in California due to ample sunlight during the summer months which isn't true elsewhere. When the sun isn't shining we burn peaking methane which is expensive and dirty. Methane companies love pairing it with solar since they can charge peaking prices every single night.
Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.