That is pretty cool!
Now we only need an Obsidian plugin for it!

If it was a truly object oriented system, you could put a spreadsheet into a cell :P

Those cells/panels exist, too. They are called PVT. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...

Current batteries are basically "painted".
Still with continued "research" and development, the last 100 years never was a glimpse of a chance to have batteries like we have them right now. The manufacturing technology - and material science - was simply not there.

Nope the answer is not nearly always "no".

It is just so that not on all break throughs anyone is interested in investing the time and money to make it mass market ready.

In this case however: it is already ready. There is one UK company doing it, I think one Canadian, too. And: dozens of Chinese companies.

He is old, he is not keeping track on what is going on in the word.

Every majour company is working on transition to quantum decryption save algorithms.

Just go to a random software conference and there will be plenty of talks about that.

Can I now recover my lost password for my Bitcoin wallet?

(A) AI output has no copyright.
That depends on the country - or the law.

There may be copyright from stolen training data still in place though if the AI produces too verbatim.
Then that data would be copyrighted ... and the guy using it for training his new AI, would also infringe copyright.
No (new) AI company wants to risk such things.

I have been on it a bit more than a year ago. But I do not remember around when.

I doubt "AI" told me that, as you have to click "AI mode" to activate AI mode, which I only do when I do something that requires AI -I have a "free token pass", but no reason to abuse it.

A: copyright infringement on the output on another AI
B: contract violation. Because of A) every training contract forbids using other AIs
C: incest. You are simply back feeding stuff you know nothing about back into what you want to train. That can be useful with synthesized data, but is not what is wanted if you employ 10k internet monkeys to human fact check input and output.

I did not do a non agile project since 1998. (Actually 1992, when we invented our own agile methods)

And you: never did an agile project.

So, why complain about stuff you have no live experience in?

Most certainly I never do a non agile project for the rest of my life.

When everything in your world is politics, hype and abuse: your problem.

I learn, apply, reassess, and get better in applying.

You are constantly talking about stuff (negatively): where you absolutely have no experience in May it be AI or solar, batteries or Agile. Oh I forgot, you hate object oriented, too.

Strange.

There is no alternative.

So, what is your point again?

Agile removes the management and reduces it to a single person + users.

Win win for everyone.

Programmers organize their work themselves instead of getting pressed into plans done by someone else.

No idea what is wrong with that.

And that is not a "hashtree". So, what is your point again?

Everyone to stupid to give a comment to a link he links?

And? Again you forgot to make a point.

A Merkle Tree is not a tree of hashes. Unless you want to say, hashkeys are sorted in a Merkle Tree as a set of hashes.

Why not ... might make sense for what ever purpose it is done.

I think the Japanese web site is still there.

Did not visit it since 3 or 5 years, though.

Ooops: nope it is not.

Active Period: May 2001 â" March 31, 2025.