Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Amazon (Score 1) 13

If the risk were that great, you wouldn't be debating this. You would have already understood the sub-standard experience is the necessary one.

How exactly do you figure that the "necessary" experience is one in which the user can't configure "always ask for my credit card CVV number" or "always ask for MFA"? That...doesn't make any sense

Comment Re:Story checks out. (Score 2) 88

RFK Jr is a quack. But that does not mean he didnt have a message that resonated. Some of his ideas I actually got behind like reducing coloring agents and "flavor" chemicals in our food.

So what you're saying is that this quack's message resonated with fucking morons even though they knew he was a quack. Cool story!

Comment What an inspiration to young girls everywhere (Score 3, Funny) 40

Say what you will about Bill Gates, but his daughter is in inspiration to young girls everywhere, demonstrating that if they work hard, apply themselves, and go to college, they can shatter ALL of the stereotypes society uses to box women in and create an app used...to go shopping.

Comment Re:Inb4 (Score 2, Informative) 129

Inb4 states sign new laws to override federal laws. What is this statehood thing again?

This isn't Federal law. I know the legalese in the subject and summary can be hard to understand to the untrained eye, but you can tell it's not a Federal law, because it doesn't say that fuckface signed a "law" into effect; it says fuckface signed an "executive order", which is another way of saying "not a federal law"

Comment Re:The AI slop/backlash (Score 1) 56

The class in question was given IN PERSON.

lol, no it wasn't. If it was, you'd have a "receipt", lol.

I didn't carefully review the article

lol, no shit.

but that happened.

no it didn't. If it happened, the stories about it on conservative media would have referenced it, but they ALL refer to the LinkedinLearning video, not an in person class.

Anything about Linkedin Learning is a deliberate decoy

The entire story is about the content of the "Confronting Racism" video by Robin DiAngelo that was on LinkedinLearning

This is my last post on the topic.

lol, no shit. Because I proved you're a lying, little bitch. Well that, and it's time for you to queue up CockGobblers IV: The Voyage Home (To Gobble More Cock)

Comment Re:The AI slop/backlash (Score 1) 56

I love that you couldn't be assed to read your own "receipt"

Coca-Cola told Newsweek that the video and images "are not part of the company's learning curriculum." Coca-Cola said it has a "Better Together" training initiative that includes access to the LinkedIn diversity lesson but that it "was not part of the company's curriculum. We will continue to listen to our employees and refine our learning programs as appropriate." On Tuesday, Coca-Cola sent an additional statement to Newsweek that read: "The video in question was accessible on a third-party platform and was not part of the company's curriculum, so it was not required. Our overall diversity, equity and inclusion training is required and received input from employees reflecting a wide range of backgrounds, views and expertise."

Was the article too many words for you to understand? Do you need it spelled out for you?

1) Coca-Cola subscribed to the Linkedin Learning training platform

2) Subscriptions to LinkedIn Learning get access to all of the content in the platform. Subscribers don't pick and choose with videos they get access to.

3) Coca-Cola's diversity training used videos in the Linkedin Learning platform, but that video was not one that was part of their training. Notice how your "receipt" doesn't have any proof that it was part of their training?

4) Coca-Cola employees could access that video within LinkedInLearning, just as they could access every other video in LinkedInLearning, but it wasn't mandatory, just as all the other content in LinkedInLearning that wasn't part of Coca-Cola's training wasn't mandatory

Being able to access a video doesn't mean it's mandatory. For example, just because your cable subscription gives you access to CockGobblers III: The Search For More Cocks To Gobble, that doesn't mean it's mandatory for you to watch it; it's something you do on your own because you take your hobbies seriously.

"hERE's mY rECeiPT", lol, lmao. you illiterate, gullible fucking clown

Comment Re:The AI slop/backlash (Score 2) 56

I'm not mad at Coke for their ads, but they've earned my lifelong boycott for telling their employees to be less white.

Waiter: Anything to drink?

You: Pepsi, please.

Waiter: Sorry, we don't have Pepsi, is Coke okay?

You: No. I'm boycotting Coke for the rest of my life for something they didn't actually do.

Waiter: Oh, I see -- you're a sad little bitch. Would the sad wittle bitch wike some chocwate milk and some cwayons to dwraw wif?

You: Goo-goo, ga-ga

Slashdot Top Deals

Is a person who blows up banks an econoclast?

Working...