It's sad to think that whoever wrote this probably thinks they're being clever

Most investors have no clue what they're investing in. They're muppets who don't know where else to put their money. It isn't hard to understand.

Imagine thinking that listening to "reputable review sites" is better than listening to customers.

Ubisoft deserves death

This is just another fee for the privilege of living in California. PAY UP!

Learning another language isn't hard

Who cares? 90% of what China does is for appearances.

China was always an illusion. Now that foreign investors are once bitten twice shy, it's being exposed as a scheme where new investment hid previous losses.

Anyway, the chip ban makes sense when you consider that China's hyper missiles have been grounded until they find a replacement source of chips. By the time that happens it may be moot.

Crap, meaning zero, because it's theoretical

Why use gmail? Trying to feed the AI and ad algorithms?

So far as I can see, there is only one way to fight this: have web sites implement Web Environment Integrity in order to disable browsers which support Web Environment Integrity. If Web Environment Integrity browsers can't access 10% of the web sites then we will have bifurcated the free web from the Google web. Anything else is pissing in the wind.

...what goodwill?

Anyway, the only way to fight this is to make web sites incompatible with the new standard. In other words implement Web Environment Integrity to display an anti-Web Environment Integrity banner that disables the web site.

So...you chose to irritate yourself?

I don't know what era you come from, but Chrome already won the browser wars.

Who ever put a gun to your head to click the link in the first place?

What idiot upvoted a post which repeats the stated goals of a proposal? Next we're supposed to believe the USA PATRIOT Act is patriotic.