Comment Re: Update from Xbox (Score 1) 32
I thought you could stream the Xbox service to PC. Did I imagine that or ate they just not going to allow PC users to stream this title?
I thought you could stream the Xbox service to PC. Did I imagine that or ate they just not going to allow PC users to stream this title?
In fact it is true.
I know your cowardly asses modded me down. You can't fight anyone who can fight back, only children who can't stop you from raping them.
"You are a rather solipsistic fellow aren't you? You never got on or off a bus in the dark so no one does."
Literally the opposite of what I said. Are you having Gemini write your comments?
It's no surprise that most Slashdotters have lost their sense of wonder, as they've forgotten what it was like to be children.
Despite DST existing, I clearly remember waiting for the bus in the dark for part of the year.
DST doesn't do what it's supposed to do, and it kills people. It's weird to celebrate that.
Well except half the streaming services are rotten with ads these days.
Its exceptionally painful in election season too. Just ugh.
Nornally I can nuke most of it via ad-blockers, But that stupid 70" samsung TV, no such luck.
(Hey, hackers, how about jailbreaking these things. Be nice to have an alternative to loungeroom spyware again)
Never underestimate the insanity and abject incompetence of windows sysadmins when given power over infrastructure.
It's a regulation forced on them by the EU's AI Act, which neither companies nor users want.
The target audience for this particular rule of the AI Act isn't the producers or users of AI. It is the consumers of content that might be AI generated.
And frankly, letting people know if they see AI content or not is a fair thing to ask.
And honestly, "not measuring how much a human contributed" is IMHO a massive flaw in general
Fun fact: The EU AI Act considers this. It makes a difference between "AI generated" and "AI modified".
But it's hard to put this into the type of watermarking they are using. Because if you generate a text and then change a few things here and there what you are doing is degrading the watermark. But since the watermark is probabilistic, it's hard to tell if it was a weak watermark from the start or if it was degraded.
The fact that the companies doing this the most seem to be the ones with the biggest revenues is a pretty good clue this is only about increasing stock dividends (and thus C-Suite bonuses)
You know, contrary to what your leftist paranoia tells you, rich people are not psychopaths, don't project your own faults onto everyone else.
Let me guess, you not only yell at people for jokes, you also yell at people for being upset at jokes.
A lawyer friend of mine uses a little fleet of small Qwens for paperwork and general office bureaucracy (He's not prepared to let them anywhere near actual lawyering for obvious reasons*) in his one man practice, and they work shockingly well. And I'm not being colorful when I say "bureaucracy" , these things are *really* bureaucratic. They've internally come up with procedures for everything including procedures for coming up with procedures. They run off a 512gb M4 mac studio and can be a little slow, but it means he gets to run it all offline airgapping them away from doing something stupid that might expose his clients data to the internet.
*He did experiment with using them to create mock trials to battletest legal arguments, and the result WAS impressive, but not impressive enough to use as part of regular legal practice and its still ia use that could anger the gods should they screw up and cite a fake case or something, so that was more for experimental purpose, though he's convinced it'd be a pretty lethal way of filtering out bad legal arguments if he monte-carloed the mock trials to figure out what sort of arguments a prosecutor could use against his own arguments.
With permanent DST we won't get the stories twice a year.
Is there any language in the Terms of Service / Terms of Use that declare that their service is a mandatory reporter?
I guarantee you that they gave themselves the right to review your input for any purpose and inform law enforcement if they feel the need. I haven't read the agreement, but I'd still bet money.
Nobody, I repeat, nobody who uses AI is going to see "OpenAI adding watermarks" and think, "Oh, I better use AI more, especially OpenAI".
You're very good at ignoring things, like the rest of the story.
Old programmers never die, they just become managers.