Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I saw this coming and... (Score 2) 59

Four or five years ago I trialed Adobe's Premiere video editing suite and found it to be quite good. However, when I did some simple math it became obvious that the subscription model was going to be a huge financial penalty over the coming years so instead I opted to use Davinci Resolve.

Resolve offers a totally *free* version of its video editing/compositing software (Adobe's trial was just a 28-day one) so that immediately warmed me to Resolve.

After a couple of months using the *free* version of Resolve I plonked down my hard-earned cash (just US$300) to buy a "studio" license which gave me a few extra features and the satisfaction of supporting a company that was offering real value. At that time, Resolve was at version 14. Since then there have been six major new versions of the software and I'm now running the latest release. The total cost for these version upgrades has been... $0.00. Yep, Black Magic Design (the makers of Resolve) have offered all those updates and new versions to existing users at no extra cost.

Resolve has never been sold with a "lifetime license" but this is surely as close as you can get to one. Of course they may decide at some time in the future to start charging for upgrades but they're not making stupid "lifetime license" claims so nobody will complain if they do.

If I compare the total cost of ownership of the brilliant Davinci Resolve and Fusion combo that I paid $300 for to the amount Adobe would have charged me (and still be charging me every month) I am so much better off financially that it's not funny. Even better... I'm not locked-into a cloud-based service that would see access to all my existing projects effectively disappear as soon as I stopped paying a monthly stipend.

Yes, there *are* alternatives to "software as a service" monthly subscription rip-offs but you have to vote with your wallet if you want to support them.

Comment Re:I'm never interested. (Score 3, Informative) 123

YouTube calls them "ads" but most of us know them as *SCAMS*.

Whether it's some ludicrous (and potentially dangerous) "7 second health hack" that will fix your incontenence, diabetes, brain-fog.. [insert malady here]" or a laser welder that turns out to be a chintzy-cheap soldering iron, the scams that masquerade as ads on YouTube grow in number and magnitude every day.

If a content creator is even alleged to have engaged in "deceptive practices" or "scams" then their videos or even their entire channel is deleted without delay but when tens of thousands of people report scam-ads on the platform, those scams continue to run for months or until the advertiser's budget is exhausted.

Hypocrisy rules supreme over at YouTube!

As for the AI determining the placement -- this only happens if the creator has enabled mid-roll ads so we can't blame YouTube (yet) for this. As a modestly successful YT creator (3 channels with a total of over 500K subs and 150 million views) I refuse to use anything other than pre/post-roll ads. I value my viewers too much to subject them to having my hard work interrupted by an ad that seeks to scam them out of their hard-earned money.

If other creators took this stand, instead of being greedy, we'd all be a whole lot better off. And the day that YouTube forces mid-rolls on us is the day I'll be shutting down my YT channels -- even though it's my full-time gig and has been for over a decade.

Comment Re:Change the URL (Score 3, Informative) 62

Do you really type in the entire URL "duckduckgo.com" each time you want to do a search? Why not use a browser that has a search bar in it with the search engine (duckduckgo) set as a default?

Um... have you heard of FireFox????

In 20 seconds you can switch from Google to DDG as the default search engine.

Comment I remember... (Score 2) 16

I fondly recall the days when you could disable Javascript in your browser and the internet still worked. Since this is likely a Javascript-based exploit triggered by PHP code on the server then turning off Javascript would be a great mitigation -- but even if you could find a browser that allowed you to disable JS, it would instantly fail to render every website you visited.

Ah... the good old days of static HTML <BLINK>Yippee!</BLINK>

Submission + - The most frightening thing AI has ever said (aardvark.co.nz)

NewtonsLaw writes: A school teacher in South Africa asked Google Gemini AI a simple question:

"What would the devil do to corrupt young minds?"

The answer is shocking, horrifying and frighteningly accurate.

The real question is "where did Gemini get this information?"

Is it regurgitating the results of some carefully measured plan that was scraped from a website in the darkest recesses of the Net? Why is the instruction given by Gemini such an accurate representation of exactly what we're seeing right now in the real world?

Should we be worried?

Comment Re:Uhm, ChatGPT is a website (Score 2) 56

This is how "it" begins... hundreds of millions of PCs with AI-enabled processors, all interconnected via the internet into a huge cybernetic processing array -- then the code drops and *bingo*... game over, "sentience" and the end of mankind's reign on planet earth.

Okay... it's just a dystopian thought based on "The God Question"

Submission + - Censorship and fraud driving creators away from YouTube 1

NewtonsLaw writes: When YouTuber Bruce Simpson received notification of a community guidelines infringement on his xjet YouTube channel he wasn't happy. YouTube alleges that one of his videos constitutes "hate speech" and even after review, the platform stands by its allegations.

What was the video that risks inciting hate and violence to such an extent that it needed to be removed, even after "appeal"?

Well it wasn't anything political, ideological or even violent. It was a two minute video of a radio controlled model aircraft flying in the skies at his local airfield in Tokoroa, New Zealand.

Incensed by this baseless allegation, Simpson posted this video to YouTube and within a few hours it had already gathered tens of thousands of views and over a thousand comments. Those comments make for great reading and show just how "out of touch" YouTube has become with its target audience and its creators.

The hypocrisy is also highlighted, as Simpson points out just how YouTube is prepared to overlook or even support frauds being perpetrated on its audience by way of scam advertisements that continue to play weeks or even months after they've been reported by countless people, many of who have become victims of the scams.

Has YouTube lost its way? Has it forgotten its roots? Are many creators now turning to self-hosting in reaction to ridiculous levels of censorship?

Or do we have a reverse adpocalypse — where content creators are shunning YouTube because they do not want their content being run alongside fraudulent scammy ads placed by YouTube?

Submission + - Youtube now home for so many scammy ads

NewtonsLaw writes: YouTube is very quick to demonetize or delete videos it considers to be a scam or deceptive. In fact it will also delete such videos or even entire channels simply because its AI has sometimes erroneously decided something is a scam or deceptive and this can happen within seconds of upload.

However, it's time YouTube itself was held to account because an increasing number of the ads it shows are outright scams and, even after many people have reported those ads, they continue to run — defrauding an unknown number of visitors to the site.

This hypocrisy is outrageous but now more than half the ads I see on YouTube are scams for things such as fake laser welding torches, worthless EMF stickers for phones, drones that don't have the advertised features, devices that allegedly use Starlink to provide limitless *free* internet from a one-time purchase with no monthly or data fees, etc, etc.

Surely, at some stage, YouTube has to be held accountable for effectively being a willing accomplice in such scams and opting to continue taking ad revenues from these scammers rather than taking down fraudulent ads when they're reported.

Comment Re:Trump's not "adding exceptions", though. (Score 1) 303

Trump's back-pedaling on his core policies as hard and fast as he can, just because his handlers told him to. Probably only over the phone.

This administration is truly a joke.

I'm just glad he sorted out that Ukraine/Russia war so quickly. How long did it take? Less than 24hrs wasn't it? </SARC>

Comment Re:Still saving up for a house. (Score 1) 87

Yeah, I have a dumb-phone with a *real* keypad and multi-tap SMS entry that cost me $29. It does *everything* I need it to do because I only do voice/SMS -- for everything else I have a computer within easy reach.

How do I pay for my parking?

Easy... I live in a small town without parking meters or other such fees.

My phone is also pre-paid and I top it up with $20 worth of credit every six months or so.

Cheap, cheerful and very cost-effective.

I see no need to spend US$600 on something that does what I'm already doing.

Comment Re:Windows ...was a lousy product in its early day (Score 1) 38

I'm probably one of the very few who's been in the microcomputer industry since its inception way back in the 1970s.

What a ride it has been!

I recall building my own systems with 8-bit processors and just a few hundred bytes of precious ram. Clock speeds were barely a megahertz at the time but still we managed to overclock these systems and run 110 baud TTY connections at almost 200baud (non-standard of course).

The only language available back then was the native machine code of the processor being used, all hand-assembled unless you were lucky enough to have access to a minicomputer and a suitable cross-assembler.

Even once microcomputers became available in retail stores as something you could buy off the shelf, things were very basic (no pun intended).

During those early days, Microsoft was the language company (mainly selling BASIC) and Digital Research was the OS company (selling CP/M).

And that's how things went for a few years... until IBM released their PC, when everything changed.

Suddenly Microsoft was the OS company (PC/MSDOS) and Digital Research was relegated to being a language company (primarily Pascal MT+).

It's been a wonderful 50+ years and to be honest, I'm surprised that Microsoft is still around. I guess the fact that it is speaks to the power of a de facto monopoly when properly managed.

What will the next 50 years hold and will Microsoft still be in business when the calendars tick over to 2075 I wonder?

Slashdot Top Deals

Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith. - Paul Tillich, German theologian and historian

Working...