And it can likely be taken literally, even the developers probably don't like it, except for being able to tell everyone they're holding it wrong if they want other options....
Just a yes/no question to see if I got what's essential regarding privacy:
There's an authority that has the users' complete data, passed there through an ID scan. Let's disregard whether that is a copy of an image/scan, or a card briefly taken from dad.
A user wants to enter a restricted online section, gets some bits, which he can inspect not to contain any clearly identifiable information neither about the site nor the person, from that site, has the authority sign it with the addition that the requirement (age or whatever) is fulfilled, then passes it on to the site to enter the restricted section.
Upton entering another site's restricted area, they again get some non identifiable bits signed by the authority, so access is granted but totally unrelated to the other site.
Does that cover it more or less?
Source: I've worked with and designed high temperature electronics, highest temps my colleagues had electronics for was 250 ÂC, obviously for a limited lifetime of 1000 hours. I've also done chip design for mobile phones, where I experienced the torture testing called HTOL, 1000 hours at 125 ÂC in operation. Most expensive PCBs I've come across in my career.
The reason to have good cooling is to avoid high temperatures. The other alternative is too be able to be withstand high temperatures, which is a niche discipline, so ultra costly and very limited in terms of components. So most of the world went to the first option.
they weigh about 200 lbs (10 stone for the Europeans).
For the Brits perhaps, most Europeans have no clue about stones. SI has kilos. Rounded it's probably 100 kg.
There's no serious problem thinkable to which social media is ever truly the optimum solution.
Luckily, nowadays, it's at least perfectly acceptable to state that one stays away on purpose. But we should kick the habit. Getting youngsters off it is just the start.
When signal has pending messages for a user, the signal message server sends an empty "ping" notification for the signal user to Apple. iOS notification service delivers the notification to signal. Signal then wakes up and picks up the encrypted message from the cloud, decrypts it, and pops a notification containing the plain text.
Wait what...? So any messenger app has to go through Apple, Google or perhaps even Samsung to get a message delivered to a phone? Or is this just Apple specific?
Regarding precision, on my Nokia internet tablet I got near pixel precision, yes, not at the level of using a mouse on a pc but miles above what a finger on a display can do. But it just doesn't matter anymore, usage has changed. Power users were the least convinced, they held on to their Nokia communicators and N95 for a long time.
As for keyboards, sliders, etcetera, sure, more screen real estate is better, but for instance a touch area on the back or the fixed mouse idea were interesting. Meanwhile, the world moves on and all mobile apps and sites take into account that a part of the screen is sometimes obscured by fingers which aren't too precise.
Make headway at work. Continue to let things deteriorate at home.