For the sake of simplicity and readability, I'm calling these wallets A, B, C, etc.

On 2020-02-25 15:41, wallet A transferred 111857.24579800 BTC, with 5000 BTC going to wallet X and the rest going to wallet B.

On 2020-04-01 13:55, wallet B transferred 106857.24571944 BTC , with 5000 BTC going to wallet Y and the rest going to wallet C.

On 2020-06-26 17:56, wallet C transferred 101857.24568009 BTC, with 5000 BTC going to wallet Z and the rest going to wallet D.

Are you beginning to see that there's a pattern to these transactions? This latest "mysterious" transaction is but a single tree in a forest. Would anyone like to bet me that we won't see wallet D making a similar outgoing transfer sometime around August?

Allow me to suggest that wallets A, B, C, and D are likely all owned by the same person or entity... if that is the case, then what we actually see is that they've spent 5000 BTC on each of those dates. In fact it's entirely possible that they also own wallets X, Y, and Z, and merely wanted an additional layer of transactions to help insulate themselves from when those bitcoins were actually spent.

According to the description on figure 4, the battery provides 0.5 volts:

Additionally, supplementary table S3 (PDF, page 11 of 14 or PNG) also lists the voltage at 0.5 volts.

No, first you increment and then you shift left twice*. Increment is a unary operation, so you avoid an unnecessary operand.

Why does your browser use a crappy font for monospaced text? There's a setting for that. Mine uses Consolas. It's readable. And it differentiates between O and 0, and other characters that look similar (if not identical) in most other fonts.

42

No, no... the reason for DRM's existence is to enable users who have the money to obtain content. Otherwise, the creators could keep it to themselves and nobody would benefit from it! Repeat after me: war is peace. freedom is slavery. ignorance is strength. DRM is good.

I joke, but I think there are must be people who actually believe this. It's the only logical explanation for some people's behavior. The W3C is just the latest example...

Yeah, unfortunately on mine the device was removed entirely. I tried to find an older driver that had it, but it always said that it wasn't the right driver.

Same reason as the newer RealTek sound drivers have disabled/removed the Stereo Mix recording device: DRM.

Not nearly as soon as I'd like.

The unicode looked fine in the preview.

Editors, do your editing thing and please fix it if this story gets selected.

Did you read the whole article? One photon will be re-emitted in identical form to the original, but two photons will likely be re-emitted as a single, molecule-like unit.

Actually, it's designed to be web-facing.

Worse, this is a laughably simple exploit of the web-facing interface:

In other words, it's about as simple as GET /../config.bog HTTP/1.1

Also, forgot to mention, isn't the implication of some cracked / some non cracked that whoever originally got their hands on the data only has the hashes, not the full passwords?

Of course, it's also possible that some scavenger started cracking the SHA-1 hashes in a file that someone else released...

Thanks for that info.

I checked the tail end of the SHA-1 hash of my LinkedIn password; it wasn't in the list, neither zeroed or in full. I'd already signed into LinkedIn and changed it, so it's moot, but yeah, my password wasn't in the dump.