it takes a lot of extra energy to move that extra mass
You'd think so, but it actually doesn't. It takes more energy to accelerate a heavier vehicle, but an EV doesn't just use all that kinetic energy to heat up the brakes when you stop, it goes back into the battery.
Cars don't propel themselves by generating thrust, and hydrocarbons are enormous. Were you thinking of aircraft and hydrogen fuel cells?
That's because synthetic, renewable fuel is usually used as an excuse to take no action and keep burning fossil fuels rather than an actual plan for the future. "The future is synthetic fuel!
The absurd efficiency means electrification is the best solution unless it's something batteries can't do, like carry enough energy for medium and long distance flight.
However, most cars are used in cities while rural and distance travel is a small fraction
Yes, the vast majority of driving is short distance, but people who are buying a vehicle will want one that covers all of their usage. That's what fast chargers on the highways are for - they make those occasional long trips slightly slower, so owning a short range EV just means one or two more charging stops per year instead of being unable to do it.
PHEV is the easiest drivetrain to live with in a daily basis.
Well, it depends on your usage and situation. If you have home charging, you only need public chargers if you're driving more than your vehicle's range in a single day. With a modern 250+ mile EV, some people would only use a public charger once or twice a year. So it winds up being easier and less time consuming than taking your car somewhere to fill it up every week or two.
"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt." -- a saying at RPI