Comment Re:Driver's education (Score 1) 1651
I'm not sure that always holding drivers responsible for accidents with bikes in every situation is a good idea if you're at first trying to encourage cycling without a supporting infrastructure; it might be better to actually encourage better use of the roads on both sides before cycling is a common form of transportation in a particular area. While I've had a friend clipped a couple of times by cars (who often like to then just flee the scene), I've seen far more situations where the only reason the cyclist was not sent off of their bike was because of either sheer dumb luck or a particularly good set of brakes on the car that actually had the right of way (I usually see cyclists run a red light roughly once every week or two, and stop signs basically multiple times per day, regardless of what's actually happening at that intersection). Unfortunately with cycling as a main form of transportation being uncommon, while many drivers are unaware of how they should react many cyclists are also unaware of what they should be doing for basic safety and tend to treat riding on the road like riding on the sidewalk.
If my city had better bike lane coverage-- it isn't bad, but it's spotty and sometimes lazy-- it probably wouldn't be a bad idea, but when you're still at the point you need to be concerned about bikes going down the yellow between rows of cars (another thing I see not infrequently one some of the one-way streets) and speeding out into intersections from spots that are difficult to see from *both* sides of oncoming traffic I don't believe that sort of law would be appropriate. It's frustrating, though, when cyclists who are actually well-mannered and make excellent use of the don't seem to be getting the kind of protection (or respect from other cars) that they need.