Try googling "irony". What am I saying. You don't know how to Google. My mistake.

This is what makes you a troll. You are unwilling to learn, and want to blame me for your unwillingness to do so. I'm not "calling you an idiot", I pointed out that you are, in fact, an idiot, if only because you are trying to double down on your ignorance and claim that it is up to me to explain to you why even after I have walked you through the steps you could taketo do it. You have now spent far more time closing you are right when you aren't than it would to understand why you are completely wrong. You will never succeed in life because you prefer sticking to making stupid comments over learning why you keep making stupid comments.

Go to gemini.google.com and enter "Why am I wrong to think that the AI industry pays other electricity prices than locals and gets other power lines when building data centers. And noise follows an inverse power law, so If you're not living on site, you won't hear anything in your home." There you will find an extremely long explanation to help you understand that you have literally no clue what you are talking about. I considered posting the results here, but there is literally so much you don't have a clue about that I would have to spend about 10 minutes to try to include it here, even just with copy and paste. Just accept that you have no understanding of the issues, and if there were no issues then nobody would have any problems with them in their neighborhood. In fact they would *want* them in their neighborhood. The fact that you think you are super smart, and don't need to do any research, without being able to figure out that last point is what makes you a complete idiot.

Off you go now little troll ...

Do your own research. It isn't my job to help you avoid making stupid comments.

You should probably do a modicum of research before commenting. I'm reminded of the old adage commonly falsely attributed to Lincoln or Twain: "It's better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

I wasn't talking about LLMs, I was talking about AI systems. You are lost in old paradigms because you still have no idea how an AI model is constructed and think LLM and AI are two different abbreviations that mean the same thing.

... you are an incompetent moron unwilling to learn how to properly perform basic tasks in the real world.

Perhaps you might consider that they are all constantly lying, and so when you combine the fact that the lie doesn't map to the facts with the realization of who said it, one would be a fool not to believe that they are lying. Of course they are lying. They were trying to psyop the Amercan public by making it look like Iran bombed their own schoolchildren and weren't counting on getting caught by the discovery that a patriot missile was used to do the bombing. You have to be an idiot if you can't figure out what really happened, that they are lying, and why the are lying.

"It wasn't a completely foreseeable consequence of not double checking things."

Your post makes no sense, because you don't know the difference between a subject line and the body. Pro Tip: The body of your post does *not* begin in the subject line, but if you absolutely *must* do something so stupid then put ellipses after the words in the subject line and before the first words in the body.

There is a youtube video by "I Ask AI" where they ask 8 different AIs to pick the worst President in the last 100 years. Trump's Truth Social AI picks Trump, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that AI is much more intelligent than Trump.

" I expected him to stick "Trump" somewhere in the name"

He would have, but "Trump Intelligence" is already reserved and refers to the level of intelligence of an amoeba.

Add to that the consideration that a *lot* of humans can't even figure out that Trump is dangerous and many of those humans will be interacting with AI systems. I can already 100% guarantee that AI is an amplifier of human stupidity, and the question is not "will it be involved in the downfall of humanity", but merely "how long until that happens." People think that in order for AI to "kill us all" they have to do it on their own, or have intent to do so. Just as "guns don't kill people, people kill people" so too can it be said that "AI won't kill humanity. People will kill humanity."

You don't seem to understand that, while it is true that this mistake was caught by humans, there are currently systems with less human interaction and things are moving in the direction of taking humans out of the loop entirely.

"The question is ultimately if you would have been better served with doing your own investigation rather than relying on AI, did you retain the knowledge, and was the information complete/accurate."

no,yes, and mostly, respectively. You are lost in a broken paradigm where you think AI is some kind of assisted search technology. With frontier models you can have intelligent conversations, and they are pretty much always more beneficial than talking to most people. They provide links to sources, but they go far beyond being mere sources of information. I have to assume you have either never used, or never actually learned to properly use, AI.