IT should be responsible if given sufficient resources and latitude to implement security measures. The problem is that that is not always the case. Many times one of those is lacking and that is the responsibility of the executives.

You sound like a horrible human being that would get hit by a bus tomorrow if karma existed.

Older men also have a higher incidence of Autism in their offspring so that means you have to limit men as well.

This is not true in any way. There are no known links. Stop spreading uninformed bullshit.

At least Satan would more competent than the fool currently occupying the White House.

One is a non-profit helping people around the world. The other is a for profit helping the President's daughter. How are you blind to this difference?

The problem with that argument is that there are a ton of people in the White House who are NOT the President. None of this applies to them. It only applies to the President. Congress can certainly enact laws that govern what members of the White House staff can and cannot do.

I'm not sure why you think that would require a constitutional amendment.

How did that work out for him? Not so good.

So pretty much in line with most stories about "hacking". Accessing a system that has a blank password is considered hacking to the media.

I am using Teams and it is actually pretty nice.

Companies became huge before computers. Should we just get rid of computers?

I find these comments to be utterly stupid. Have you ever worked anywhere before? Can you possibly imagine non-engineers trying to use IRC for a collaboration tool? Even engineers can find the easy to use interface helpful. Look. I love IRC. I even ran an IRC server for a couple of years but insisting it is enough for most people is nonsense or people would have been using it in the office for collaboration for decades and it would be entrenched by now. There is a reason Slack and its competitors have blown up in recent years. It is a necessary niche. Now we are just waiting to see someone perfect the idea.

Teams cannot spy on you. Office 365 is one of the highest levels of security compliance of any online tools.

Wow. This is exactly the type of attitude that leads to serious data breaches. Not using secure tools for collaboration is increasingly becoming a regulatory risk as well. I need this security for my job and believe it or not most other people do too even if it is just to comply with regulations but also because breaches on smaller companies is becoming more and more common. Just leaking some personal information of one person can be enough to trigger notification laws in some states.