In space electricity is available for free, with no worries about maintaining the solar array. Power is a huge challenge for data centers.

Schools are designed for female students to close the "achievement gap". Female students get preferential admission. In stem, women get preferential hiring. Boys are shown they're second class citizens from the time they get into puberty. Women are taught to fear men, and men are taught they're hateful whether they're hateful or not. All this would be fine if society told them there's something good and unique about men, something to aspire to and be valued for. But "everything men can do women can do better". And now we're surprised at the fallout? Society won't be willing for the necessary reforms, especially giving men back their purpose, until things get a lot more shit than they are now.

>gish gallop Not worth responding to, except to point it out.

The hardware requirements are the least of my concern. When support for my version of Windows 10 runs out in October it's going to be the day of Linux on the desktop in my house.

>The death penalty is NOT about revenge
Most of the people who support the death penalty see it as retributive justice. i.e. revenge even if they won't put it in those terms. For example, "closure". Even if you're trying to pretty it up, much of what you want is "he did the crime and now he's done the time". tit for tat. Revenge.

The death penalty absolutely should be eliminated. But if we're murdering people isn't it better to do it painlessly?

It's a tragedy of the commons: Everyone wants to hire trained coders, no one wants to train them. Either AI will pan out and it will become a nothing-burger with LLMs shrinking your code to 10% of the size capable of running on 1/20th the cycles or businesses are going to have to train coders I mean obtain more work visas to get coders from India.

Paragraphs: there's a reason they exist.

Context isn't enough for LLMs. They forget an hallucinate all over the place even for stuff that's within the context window, making massive mistakes a human would never.

Your comment is poorly formatted and almost impossible to read without an unreasonable amount of focus. I also note the signature at the bottom. I'm guessing you copied someone else's comment and pasted as AC? Either way if you're going to be posting a long rant try to make it a coherent narrative: flow one idea into another naturally, put highly similar thoughts together and use longer paragraphs.

Even for a complete athiest, who probably hears "I have magical thinking powers" as one cartoon put it, how is it offensive to be told someone is wishing them well with their magical thinking powers? If you're angry they're not doing more, that's a you problem.

You inadvertently bring up a good point. If this is actual AI rather than "AI" they're creating AIs that are wildly misaligned, which is on the same level as creating new kinds of flu viruses with CRISPR

And before someone jumps on it, by "real person" I mean in the form he is presented, not that he didn't exist or wasn't black.

People arguing this is acceptable are using a motte and bailey. The bailey is that this is a real person. When shutting down factual arguments proving this wrong fails (and discrediting Wikipedia and its woke bent in the process) they switch to the motte that it's okay for the game to take this liberty with history because it's just a game.

Allow me to counter the motte. Yes, it's okay to make any kind of game you like with any kind of thing in it you like. But when you do so for a blatantly political reason following a long series of blatantly political choices in an attempt to rewrite history that acts in concert with many other attempts to rewrite history in the same way, I'm going to call you out on it and a lot of people are going to hate you and your game. That's not because I'm racist. It's because I hate lies, the rewriting of history, and your political agenda.

The fact that parent comment was modded down says a lot about Slashdot moderation. He makes a valid point and rather than argue it, you try to hide it. Shame.