And who exactly drank the battery acid in the first place to justify putting the warning there?

Matter of opinion. They aren't legally obligated to do so.

Is this based on objective fact or a personal observation subject to bias?

Believing that a private platform counts as a "digital town square" and further believing content moderation is equivalent to the government infringing upon free speech.

That is a stretch. Truth Social's own homepage states, " Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages... honest global conversation without discriminating against political ideology." Yet they push right-wing content as a requirement after signing up for the platform. I don't personally care one way or another, but if you're going to be mad at a platform for being partisan at least be consistent.

Why do you assume twitter has any obligation to be politically neutral? This is the most hilarious thing to me - the right consistently has the most egregious views on what constitutes "free speech" and where those boundaries end. Try logging onto Truth Social and seeing the "suggested" accounts you are required to follow after making your account - Trump, Trump Jr., GOP leaders, etc. Where's your outrage about that?

Some clothing manufacturers make women's clothing with FAKE pockets. They look like real pockets but they are sewn shut.

Luckily new fabs that can manufacture semiconductors on par with TSMC are currently being built in the US.

Most silicon chips are made in Taiwan, not China.

Only pro-businesses-they-agree-with. See: Disney, Coca-Cola, Target, Starbucks, Nike... etc etc etc. The list goes on and on.

And there is nothing stopping them from still doing so. This is about ADVERTISEMENTS.

I was mining Litecoins this morning and even though my computer was relatively quiet (mining with GPU) compared to fans at 100%, etc, it was still painfully slow. When I hovered over a link it would take a second to change colors. Literally a second. The user would probably notice that too. Though it wasn't laggy when I was mining Bitcoins so...who knows.

I'm sure you were scared for your privacy when Bush passed the Patriot Act...

My point of posting that was to show how much bitcoins are worth. Of course the "important aspect" is how much value they retain, how do you think I came up with 266 BTC?! And of course BTC value is on the rise, with bitcoins being harder to mine everyday, with that 21,000,000 bitcoins upward limit. If it were " 26.6 trillion deca-nano" bitcoins stolen, I'd say that right?! But no, I said 266 with the presumed decimal point after the second "6", that everyone else seemed to understand. I also said "approximately" because the value is not exact, and this number changes every second of every hour of every day, etc, etc. Your post was absolutely pointless and you shouldn't have even bothered posting it, you typing it and me replying to it is just a waste of time for the both of us, no offense...

Believe it or not that was only approximately 266 bitcoins.

So most of the people working at Walmart aren't supporting a family and are getting economic aid from their parents? Or McDonalds? Bullshit. When a company doesn't pay its workers enough they can't even afford to buy products at their own workplace, it damages local economy as well as on the big scale. Think about it. Economic growth is when people are spending money. That's what the 1920's were like. When there is a recession not many people are spending money and most are just sitting on it, waiting for something to happen. People spending makes businesses want and need to expand to make more products, thus economic growth. Not to mention the people at the top are walking away with billions when their workers can't even afford to feed their own family.

I thought the whole point of a Chromebook was a laptop that was affordable and practical...not very affordable anymore...

Don't know about you guys but Photoshop CS2 is free from Adobe.