"I'm not going to put in the effort to actually check the specifics of a statistical sample of different hydro plants"
Well why would you? Much easier to BS, right?
"In my previous comment I literally named a specific 440MW plant that can go from zero to 100% power in 30 seconds"
Yeah, I know. Funny how you went from:
"the power likely starts to be delivered within about 2 seconds"
to 30 seconds. Realised you were talking out your arse sonny and hoped I wouldn't notice? Also it was built in 1965, how do you think instructions to start the turbines got to them back then, carrier pigeon?
"Large scale hydro gets around this by using many turbines rather than one"
And of course conventional coal fired stations use just the one turbine.... oh, no, wait....
"That means that the moment inertia for a correctly designed pumped storage hydro plant is much much lower than that of a standard thermal plant."
Oh look at you trying to sound all clever. Maybe give ChatGPT some different prompts next time. If you think the amount of rotating mass - sorry "moment of inertia" - in a hydro turbine is less than in a steam turbine in a conventional power station then you're going to be disappointed.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hydropower.org%2Fcas...
"Maybe someone will hear your scraping and have mercy on your soul"
Yup, I was right, it is irony week. I think you get 1st prize.
I'm afraid I can't be bothered to hang around this low down the evolutionary tree to argue with you any more, but feel free to have the last word so I can have a good laugh. :o)