As long as the science backs it up, that's good, but why - "which is also found in fire retardants." You are aware, a lot of fire retardants contain water, does that make it toxic? I'm not sure that's how things work.

You must keep bluetooth on. I normally do not have it on unless I'm actively using it, so except for a very limited amount of time, this is useless.

What's to prevent someone from installing this somewhere just to mess with people? What's done to prevent false broadcasts? If they've figured that out, how are they going to do it without tracking everyone's location, so it can be sold and exploited by someone with loads of money, or used by the government?

Just to be clear, I support having companies pay for their pollution, but the Governor should not be able to create laws by himself. The title should say "Pennsylvania Court Permanently Blocks Governor's Effort To Bypass Legislature."

For me, it depends on whether the "local" newspapers will actually cover local news, and have reasonable rates. When the one near me started losing money, the first thing they cut was local news, then they started raising rates. All they were doing was taking articles from the AP and some of the larger national papers, cut/pasting them, and charging more for it. Within a year or two, they increased the rates so much that it cost for 2 months, what it used to cost for 6 months, so I quit. I wish them luck, but a lot of people have moved on to online rumor mills, and seem to be happy with them.

I ran into this before, the reviews were for something completely different than what was being sold, and there is no clear way to report it. I was resorting to reviewmeta and fakespot for a while, but they're getting muddled up (actually, fakespot became useless all on it's own, due to changes that were made to hide all meaningful insight). Anyway, Amazon reviews have really become completely worthless, because of -
1. Sellers gaming the system.
      a. Switching the product associated with reviews (as cited in original post).
      b. Creating fake accounts and selling to them, so they can write positive reviews (see news about people inexplicably receiving seeds in the mail that they didn't order), and become a "top seller."
      c. Writing negative reviews for competing products.
2. People with grudges posting negative reviews (see review bombing).

If I can, I try to find a reputable review of things I want to buy, but that is hard to do because -
1. Companies are constantly churning out new models.
2. So many options exist for given competing products, it's nearly impossible to find more than one review of the same product.
3. Horrible search results that list sites I've never heard of before.

It's interesting that this has only become an issue when they started censoring the "wrong" posts (according to politicians). If opposing politicians came up with this, it'd be derided as Socialism and an attack on the Free Market. Just a continuing confirmation of the narrow mindedness people cling to.

The mistake Amazon made was not to use fake grass roots organizations for their effort. Whoever worked on this must not have much experience trying to influence elections.

I don't believe the reported price has anything to do with general acceptance. I suppose in order to have some value, some people have to accept that value, but that doesn't mean the general public consider it acceptable in everyday transactions. If anything the price volatility goes against it for that purpose. Beyond that, what is this price based on, individual trades, if so what market is this in? Who trusts the people that manage the market? Do we know they are reporting things properly? What price controls are in place? How susceptible is it to price manipulation? Say, for example, I put my bitcoin in a bitcoin bank, what are my protections if it just disappears (which appears to be happening regularly)?

Watch the "Merlin" series...
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.imdb.com%2Ftitle%2Ftt1...

Seriously though, it's just a TV Show, move on.

I'm not sure how you can equate the UK with the US. To qualify for Medicare you need to be above a certain age or meet some very specific medical conditions. To qualify for Medicaid the maximum income is horribly low ($16,753 single/$34,638 family of four, according to what I found). If you don't qualify for either and can't afford insurance, the clinics you mention might help, but I'm not aware of any within a 100 miles of where I am. I am aware of physicians that dropped insurance and went with payment plans or the like, but then that only helps when you go to see them specifically, and doesn't cover prescriptions, blood work, seeing other specialists, hospitalization, emergency care, etc. If you don't have insurance and have an emergency or chronic illness/condition, in most places in the US, there are no real options (besides possibly bankruptcy for the emergency bill).

I hope it's more useful than I'm imagining. When someone is unconscious and someone else calls 911, they're not going to be able to browse a list of ambulance providers and hospitals and review prices. Also, most people that don't have insurance, don't have a lot of money in general, so I'm not sure how helpful this would be, unless there are places that provide reasonably competent care for pennies in comparison to what I've seen.

Outrage is all the rage right now. If it wasn't clear in this video, this is just a guy doing some youtube videos on the side, trying to coordinate things with friends and volunteers. If you watched several of his videos, this is entirely obvious, and he does not try to hide it. He is not an investigative journalist or detective, so you have to take that into account, as he may not be as rigorous in some of his methods. I was obviously skeptical when he lent the device to other people, as anyone should be. Based on the evidence, you could possibly blame him for being naive or gullible, but that is about it. If you have a problem with it going forward, just don't watch his videos, and simply question the credibility of any information where he is the source. Although, I suspect people will take it further though (harassment, etc), and I hope he doesn't suffer undue consequences.

All it takes is google and searching for "xyz Layoffs"

AT&T: http://www.chicagotribune.com/...
Comcast: http://www.newsweek.com/comcas...
Wal-mart: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticl...

I have not seen JetBlue, but the others, yes.

^ This ^

Oooh, look, shiny bonuses. (btw we're laying off hundreds/thousands, and forcing people to sign NDA's to get any severance/etc)