Does the summary not state

AI generated reader letters would either be a fraud *or* a secondary AI reading the newspaper, and sending it a letter. I'm pretty sure newspapers generally are not supposed to create their own reader letters.

Not only is this old news, it has also already been debunked a few times. This road was already planned a long time ago, way before the summit was even appointed. So yes, the news is that they felled a forest to build a road, but dragging the climate summit into this is just a trumpian naarrative

To me this suggests that the toxins are released into the water within 1 minute, and very limited amounts leech out afterwards. Would this not suggest that a proper pretreatment would address the toxicity? Also, it would indicate that re-using these containers is fairly safe

Editors, bacteria is plural. I think you mean [a species of bacteria] if you must. The singular is [bacterium], but that tends to indicate a single organism.

Also known as tying up loose ends⦠youâ(TM)d be doing russia and china a favour. You donâ(TM)t think Putin or Xi care about the human lives do you?

I must say the term "WALL-E" was the first thing i thought of

Or you could argue that Apple could afford tax lawyers and know exactly what gamble they were taking by selecting Ireland and its too-good-to-be-true conditions.

I do not understand why everyone thinks Apple did not see this as a business risk and took the gamble. I'm quite sure they knew *exactly* what the EU tax laws are and what they were getting into

TO my knowledge C code is also valid C++ code. I do not think C# is valid C code or vice versa. So saying they are equally different seems incorrect to me

TO my undertanding C# is to C what Javascript is to Java.... the syntax is a little similar, the application scope and the performance is very different. Is it fair to collapse C# with C?

This poll is from pycharm, clearly aimed with a commercial mindset. For example, WingIDE has been around for decades and is on par (in my view superior) with pycharm, but always conveniently left out of the options

No because the commands to send were different for each machine

WHich would be irrelevant, as this mostly deals with dairy farming. The actual profit, where you need to take into account government subsidies, imported food (soy from brazil), fluctuating milk prices and some profit from meat (young bulls, older cows).

I knew this for decades. PHP already has 4 different meanings of equal. Mathematics sure is slow to catch up

Indeed the summary is either really dumb, or the researchers do not understand their own methods.

This method copies the light reaction of photosynthesis. There is no water as byproduct. Quite the opposite: water is the input from which oxygen (and H+ and electrons) is derived.

In algae, the CO2 is sequestered in the subsequent dark reaction of photosynthesis, which also consumes energy (NADPH, ATP) that is created in the light reaction. The dark reaction is a complex chemical cycle that does not produce any electrons.

And I'm sorry but that bit about coal formed by trees is nonsense. Wood in an anaerobic context is not usable for bacteria that break down cellulose. This is why peat exists. Similar for coal. Trees are fine as carbon sequestering as long as you either store them dry or anaerobic. But all of that is not in scope of this paper.