Comment Re: This is fundamentally different (Score 1) 7
so, bring back at&t, bell labs, kill apple andd keep ms as it was meant to be according to the competition and most importantly let Huawei and other chink companies compete in the market.
so, bring back at&t, bell labs, kill apple andd keep ms as it was meant to be according to the competition and most importantly let Huawei and other chink companies compete in the market.
cock.li for mail
4chan/8kun for posting
lineage os w/o gapps and w/ fdroid
date your local thotts, not from internet
gitgud for your code
invidio.us for videos
telegram and telegram groups for chatting
gab for social
palemoon for browser
debian for os
amd h/w for both cpu and gpu
it's not hard to find alternatives but I agree with you that it sucks to be a normie in 2020, you are an e-cow that corps milk you for your data.
>Sorry, anonymous posting has been turned off. Please register and log in.
and that why I haven't posted here for over a year and che/. only from my oss rss feed reader
"A Feature in iOS Allows One To Access Someone's iPhone Camera And Microphone and record everything"
ftfy.
Facetime devs did nothing wrong. They used this feature(it's not a bug) to improve their normie user experience.
I don't want to argue with idiots, so I'll leave this here.
Yikes, libtards... smh.
Intel doesn't need a Lisa Su.
They need a Rory Read. If they fibd a Rory Read, then he will be able to pass the company to some Lisa Su.
Hint: Rory hired Lisa.
>implying
openssl had 10 severe vulnerabilities caused by those "senior" programmers.
You don't get my point anyway.
If you want certified or "safe" s/w, you're off to corporate s/w(a.k.a. closed source). OSS comes with this(example from GPL):
THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM âoeAS ISâ WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
at its finest.
OK, let's paint the big picture here.
The E.U. just prints money. Every "green", "OSS", or any similar move that they've done, has been initiated because they wanted to absorb a buttload of money.
e.g. there are many members of the e.u. parliament, with ties to "green" companies, that have been getting many years money due to their "green" operations.
Now, what's this "initiative"? This is probably the same high corruption scum. These projects could've been funded, with manpower ofc, not direct funding, in order to help free s/w. A 90k bounty for a bug doesn't solve the problem.
A 2 year contract for graduate with 90k in total, could've benefited such projects in greater extend by just fixing a bug. You could help a graduate start filling his CV, you could give man power to projects that need it and in the end those people could fix critical bugs, non-critical ones and even contribute more features.
Bug bounty hunting for non-corporate s/w is wasteful and doesn't help neither(is this considered a double negative?) the project that much, nor contributes back to developers who want to work on it but don't have the experience to deal with those bugs *in-time*.
sad merchant
in a more woke
quote1: Israel has the solution, a wall.
quote2: and they made USA pay for it!
that's a lot of gender studies graduates.
the company never claimed that they are going to demonstrate a robot, the TV journalist claimed it.
This is not a case of a corporate scum, but a stupid journalist.
last 2-3 gens of apple laptops have been having dead keyboards due to dust.
I've never seen any laptop having such issues with dust.
You maybe have to clean the cooler grills after a decade of use, but that's it.
"Americans want to be abused.
I wish Americans had a functioning brain."
do you see how easy it is to find the source of the problem?
Why would your government intervene, when you want to sign a contract that has so many constraints?
Why would you support a service that is after your money and doesn't respect you as a customer.
This is one of the reasons that "free market" fails, because customers are stupid and when they fuck up they want their Daddy to take care of the bad guys.
5. Your mom
no u
A rock store eventually closed down; they were taking too much for granite.