
Journal TopShelf's Journal: Question for Jeremiah Cornelius 4
Since I can't comment within this JE, I thought I'd pose the question here.
If the implication is that the latest terrorist arrests in London were timed by the government in order to ratchet up the fear factor and bring voters towards President Bush and his supporters, then why wouldn't they have had the arrests made just a few days earlier, when it would have helped Joe Lieberman (a supporter of the War on Terror) in his primary bid in Connecticut?
There's so much going on in the world that "Something" always occurs within a few days of "Something Else". Spend too much time trying to draw interconnections and you'll end up just chasing your own tail.
I think the worst part here is that the administration has blown its credibility so badly that large amounts of people just don't believe anything it (or the British government) say any more.
There's a saying (Score:2, Insightful)
Fixed my defaults. (Score:2)
Re:Fixed my defaults. (Score:1)
It's a matter of historical interest WHY they're constantly lying about this sort of thing. It's a matter of immediate urgency that there be a discovery made as to how to STOP them from doing it, period.
Re:Fixed my defaults. (Score:2)