Couldn't have said it better myself. Productivity measured how? None of these statistics and 10-30% is pretty bad if it's just productivity in "generating code" - slamming out code is usually the wrong choice. A good senior developer makes strategic decisions that improve the maintainability of code and fix problems that nobody's even reported yet, AI won't do that.

This is the most useless idea I've ever heard and I work in tech so that's saying something.

This feels like a bait article honestly. And here I am falling for the bait.

Launch costs oh yeah lets just handwave away the climate impact of that. Never mind how expensive it is to launch things either, the cost of hardware and installation doesn't matter if the CO2 goes down (except that it does because that money could be used to save CO2 emissions somewhere else, obviously).

The obvious latency issues. The wildly unreasonable cost of what it takes to fix anything that fails in orbit. I could go on but my main point here is why is this even featured here? It's obviously a garbage idea with no future.

Might be a good idea except that it only filters air on the way in. So this is a tool for selfish folks only. Dyson shouldn't have brought this to market.

I cannot like the new interface either. I can barely like classic mode since it seems to have removed a lot of shit. The new config system is awful and doesn't expose as many options. Sigh. Has anyone forked it wholesale yet?

Ah, the fresh smell of decay and newly frost-pulverized plant cells.

I was exposed. I did not get it.

I don't call a probe that is consitently leaving the primary gravity source a 'satellite'.