Christ, you fucking morons.

Thinking that a quantity matters without a reference- i.e., context
Seriously, did your father skullfuck you as a child? What the fuck made you so goddamn stupid?

Another day, another google debunk failure on your part.
Not one single one of those links demonstrated that it was a serious problem.
You'd know that if you had actually read them instead of googling and copying links like a fucking dipshit.
Each one of them provides a handy number of households for impact gauging- and oh my god, I'm here to tell you that I think Arizona will survive the loss of the annual water supply of 45,000 single-family homes. Especially since it has about 1.3 fucking million of them.

We sure do. Like your gasoline. And letting them rot. Both of which subsidized by your government. Both using many hundred times the water in question here.

You never get tired of being a failure, do you?

But would we? If WB goes under and its bones get picked apart by Netflix and Paramount and whomever all that content doesn't go away, those producers get rehired, we're down a streaming service anyways, their catalog an assets are split up what did we as consumers lose out on long term? More fragmenting and siloing of content? I guess some convenience is lost but really do we lose or is most of the loss for the shareholders?

No, it wouldn't.
Is that how you think analogies work?

Well that depends, doesn't it?
If you put a V8 in a car, not so revolutionary. Put an RB-25 on the back of it? Pretty fucking revolutionary.
So, putting a motor in that dramatically changes the characteristics of this thing vs. what existed before- can be revolutionary, can't it?

lol. Are you trolling?
Arm (it's not capitalized) chips with power comparable (not to mention better) than any PC mobile-class chip were absolutely new when they made the switch.
Hell, they're still the only game in town, there.

Oh, totally. Your shitty Raspberry Pi is completely comparable to a device that performs 14x better than it.
Come the fuck on.

One wonders if you know what a quantum CPU is. Given how ignorant your comment was, I'm going to go with no. I won't explain to you why there'd be nothing revolutionary about putting a quantum CPU into a computer, any more so than putting a water faucet in place of the motor in your car.

Apple Silicon CPUs in a laptop put the power of a workstation-class laptop in the power envelope of a netbook.
To this day, you cannot find a comparison of a PC and a MacBook that doesn't sacrifice every shred of intellectual honesty the person has,.
You can have better performance, if you don't mind 2 hours of battery life, and you can have half as much battery life as the MacBook, if you don't mind the performance of a Nintendo Switch.

There's upping things a notch, and then there is smashing through the glass ceiling, and that is revolutionary.

Everywhere you look you only see your enemies, a few people have tries to lead you to a normal mode of thinking, but I always say: you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

P.S. I'm not a leftist, but thanks for playing.

That one's a little tickly.
You're undeniably right that the pardon power definitely makes it so that consequences of ignoring an injunction are nil, I personally wouldn't test it to too much extent. It's basically a constitutional crisis. If the Supreme Court considers an injunction legal, then it is, by definition, legal. If the President ignores this, he is, by definition, a criminal, and has violated his oath of office. Not saying it can't technically happen- but realistically- it doesn't happen.

There's also the problem with non-Federal courts, which the Executive has no pardon power over.

Ballistic missile. Not drone.

Actually a drone. Notable undetected by air defenses.

Ballistic missile. Not drone.

This page contains 2 references to 1 event, which funny enough is the event in link 2.

So, what you've got here is 1 drone strike. No casualties.
320 drones.
As for their strikes against US targets, we've got 0 successful hits out of 170 drones.
Combined, 1 hit, no casualties, for 490 drones.
So it's not quite 1:1000, but 1:490 is still just as laughable.

You have got to he the laziest fucking attempted google debunker ever. Or maybe the goal is to just waste my time demonstrating that you're a moron.

Not really. One glance at a modern (post-mid-1950) curriculum will show you that.

I hope they can still teach students about a strawman argument.

Democracy and freedom isn't free. You have to fight for it every day. The religious right wants to take away my human rights and your human rights, and if you want to carry water for them then be prepared to serve underneath them on day.

Free forum is a free soapbox. I couldn't give two shits about your insufferable opinion of other people's opinions. But I think you already know that, other Slashdotters are certainly communicated a similar sentiment to you before.

I'm sure to your scared little brain, that's exactly what's going on. Fortunately for you, FSM invented benzodiazepines.
The political situation in the US is pretty fucked at the moment, but court tolerance of the shooting of civilians is the lowest it has ever been.

Indeed they did, and indeed it was.

For sure.

History has taught me that it's unwise to declare groups of people unpeople by fiat, as it seems that I myself belong to one or more groupings of people.

Ya, that's separate though.

Apple's transition to x86 was not revolutionary. Apple Silicon is.
It quite literally changed the face of the laptop market.

Where previously, the more powerful the computer you had, the less portable it was, now you could have a laptop as powerful as the most powerful PC laptops, that lasted as long as the most battery-conservative netbooks.
Changes to Apple Silicon since, and throwing it in iPads- not revolutionary. Just iterative upgrades. But Apple Silicon laptops broke the laptop mold.

Police. They would be breaking the law.
If you are asking who would stop them if they decided to overthrow lawful authorities? That's a different, and frankly stupid question.

Na.
If we start losing one bad enough, in that it results in mass destruction of our domestic capacity- then ya, I'd agree with that.
That's uhhh, well the end stage of us losing WW3, though.