How much Intel stock do you have? Is it actually legal for you to mod me down?

There are a whole bunch of examples of LLMs which have access to actual resources, so that's completely false. Why don't you go somewhere else and talk about things you know nothing about?

Could I be the reason my mom doesn't like children?

If your business is failing, try adding some AI to it. Sure, none of your customers asked for it, and it's not clear how spending millions on data center fees translates into profit. But investors love it, and that's how a bubble rises to the top!

It's really difficult to buy glasses in the US that aren't part of one of EssilorLuxottica's holdings.

Is to throw your crew overboard?

XML is far more readable than JSON. It does also suck, though.

I haven't had to do much with YAML, but I cannot imagine what you mean by "easier to transmit", given their similarity.

The people without hope gave up and died.

The people with too much hope are suckers.

The people with just enough hope to succeed but not enough to be suckers took control of the system and manipulated it in ways that make people into suckers, and make suckers into bigger suckers.

If Musk cared, it was because he was worried about his speech being censored. His own actions prove that he's not anti-censorship in the least, as long as he's the one doing the censoring.

At the point where you provide an amicus curiae brief as if it were a court decision?

I read an article on this a little while ago, I believe it quoted Powell as saying that he didn't advise her to do this until she had already done it. Who knows whether that's bullshit or not, or for that matter, if I'm even remembering correctly. I'm not currently on the machine with the relevant browser history, or I'd try to find it.

BUT, there absolutely was a legal problem with it then, especially for Powell, because he explicitly advised Clinton to run her own server for the purpose of avoiding discovery by being able to delete communications. And that is illegal when you are required to retain all official communications, which was the case.

I think most of us who have been here more than a hot second also remember discussing here that one of Clinton's staffers was reported to be seeking advice on email deletion.

If you gave an LLM access to a legal database, not training it on it but allowing it to pull things from it, then you should be able to use it to check citations. It should be able to handle both looking things up and reporting null results, and also summarizing those cases it does find and doing a better-than-nothing job of reporting whether they were cited correctly.

If I were a lawyer I wouldn't trust such a thing to check my citations, but I would absolutely use it to look for low-hanging fruit in my opponent's work.

Why would you think that? I thought you knew something about this technology.

The UN was willing to commit to the motion, so long as the members didn't have to commit to actually doing anything.

It turned out to be true. We connected them all to "the internet" and now they spend all their time generating images of furries with mommy milkers.