Comment Re:Don't wanna (Score -1) 186
I certainly got that hint, when after making one mildly snarky (but on-topic) first-post, my karma was nuked down to the lowest possible level.
Comment Re:Official response from Latvian goverment (Score -1) 177
Aizver muti!
Comment Re:125 MORE years until the US gets time... (Score -1) 429
Maybe it's your locale settings? Google fight report disagrees with your numbers: http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=fourth+of+july&word2=july+fourth
Comment Re:Palm's only partially getting it (Score 0, Interesting) 174
if Apple couldn't show that they've checked EVERY app they've allowed on their phone (and, as a result, into the international cell network) without reasonably ensuring that the app doesn't cause an individual's phone to die or, worse, infect the iPhone net (and others) with bad or malicious code that could compromise the cell networks.
Android phones don't seem to have a problem, and as far as I am aware, there is no pre-screening process for apps. Granted, post-screening is done to remove certain tethering apps, but I am highly skeptical that it's possible to write an app capable to "infect the iPhone net".
Slashdot Top Deals
Real Programmers don't write in FORTRAN. FORTRAN is for pipe stress freaks and crystallography weenies. FORTRAN is for wimp engineers who wear white socks.
