Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Good luck to them (Score 3, Informative) 88

> The difference is that a human artist can't then turn around and take commissions to sell paintings of other people's IP, right? You can't just learn to draw Moana and then sell Moana TShits online - that's infringement. But Midjourney will take your money for access to their models and serve you up infringing images.

There's a disconnect between those two periods. Yes, an art student can't just start selling Moana merch. However, I don't see where Midjourney is doing that. In fact, their ToC states that you own all rights to the images you create. You are paying for the hardware resources to make freaky fingered people, not for the actual image.

Comment Re:Suffering here... (Score 1) 107

> quasi monopoly

Is this like "Jumbo Shrimp"? They're certainly a big player, but not the only one. I don't really see how being successful means we have to dislike a company. Now, if they engage in practices that make things worse for consumers, we can deride that. And I'm sure they do, but I'd honestly be surprised if its anything nonstandard. That is- anything that Epic, GOG, Amazon, Google, etc also do.

> really aren't very good with returns

Can you please explain this? I have never had a problem with getting a return, and I don't think it's a coincidence that Epic's return policy is almost word for word the same. GOG's supposedly has a month-long return window, but they're also the only ones I've ever had an issue returning a game to. That's purely anecdotal though. I'm old enough that being able to return any PC software (especially games) is huge, and to my knowledge, you still can't returned an open game to a brick and mortar store.

Comment Re: What kind of encryption did the FBI break? (Score 4, Interesting) 802

What about looking at it from another direction?

Say the FBI suddenly raided you, and brought you up on say, pedophilia charges. They confiscate your computer hardware, as is standard procedure.

Now, I'm going to take a leap of faith here and presume you have no child porn on your PC. And for the sake of my point, no encryption. But they are sure you have it somewhere, so they naturally assume that you must have encrypted ghost partitions or whatever on your hard drive(s). Maybe they even have a log provided by your ISP that says at one point, you navigated to a website that provided such encryption software in the last decade. They demand that you hand over your passwords for your encrypted drives.

Or, to use your example with the safe, say that safe was in the house that you bought, and didn't get the combination for it from the previous owners. Maybe it was hidden, and you didn't even know of its existence before the feds demanded you hand over the combination.

Being brought up on charges for forgetting or even "forgetting" your password to incriminating evidence is already bad enough. But the scenario above is what I'm truly afraid of. The problem is, in some cases they could be treated the exact same if the judge sides with the authorities after hearing your "excuses".

Comment Re:Brilliant (Score 1) 194

But still a small fraction of their wired LAN bandwidth. If you often transfer large files or stream HD video within your home network like I do, you can't afford to be generations behind or wired or wireless speed.

I call BS. A quick google search says Hollywood blueray is usually encoded around 25-35 Mb/s. So even an uncompressed video would stream just fine with an old 10/100 router and cat 5 cabling. And that's with no/minimal compression.

Big files, sure, I'll give you that. But I'd also argue the average person isn't moving files that large to and fro on their network too often.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Been through Hell? Whaddya bring back for me?" -- A. Brilliant

Working...