This was my thought too. Why did someone mark it troll?

I'd be interested in the examples of "China lies". People just run it off like it's accepted.

Note that, to be a lie, it has to be deliberately wrong, not just wrong and/or ignorance. It can be quite difficult to prove intent. Even so, something to argue against, or even agree with, would be reasonable.

Try asking it what day it is today, or tomorrow...

I use qwen frequently, and that is the thing it gets wrong most often (AFAIK), or similar, like when it says, next Monday, the 29th...ie can't even check its dates on a calendar ðY

Of course, like the western AIs, qwen also doesn't work in mainland China - not supported. It has a m/l specific version, of course, but, for me, at least, I wanted one that works everywhere.

Maybe I'll test Kimi on this...but I guess this whole AI technology is segregated. Sigh.

Reference required for...all of above...

It sounds a lot like a load of BS to me, and, at best "pot calling the kettle black"...though I don't know who the pot is in this case, so shrug. Just the ramblings of a brainwashed sinophobe, maybe.

Do you have the code for the compiler, and compile that yourself too?...and ditto for THAT compiler? All the way down...

> have not consented to being recorded, which is a legal requirement in 11 US states that have all-party consent laws.

Do we all have to comply with the lowest common denominator? Perhaps some thinks it's the hugest, but it certainly doesn't have jurisdiction everywhere.

Maybe some kind location-based jurisdiction AI is in order.

The French will be on Britain's side this time and the Germans too, probably...albeit coincidentally.

Perhaps, "Now you know how it feels!" is more likely.

"For an assignment testing students' ability to make evidence-based arguments, they participate in a simulated school board meeting about banning books. It involves debating chatbots designed by Zeleny with names like the Confrontational Parent."

This a VERY thinly veiled parallel to a hotly divided political issue that teachers/unions [and chatbot trained bias] tend be on one side of and the majority of the public, parents, and truth on the opposite of. Given that adults of the highest levels of performance in our society, be it professional achievement, economic achievement, political achievement, IQ, and education disagree on the matter it sounds like what the teacher is likely testing is alignment with her own ideology and not evidence-based arguments.

I saw the same thing in many of my own courses, examples and material used in classes [especially logic classes like critical thinking] that taught and test concepts through distilled 'analogs' to popular political issues with an attempt to appear neutral and present both sides while actually presenting a weakened strawman of one side the argument and consistently that strawman was on the same side. Cleverly these were not the topics for essays where students spent effort on time and research and independent thought but the class examples that most would never look at additional material on... simply walk away believing they formed a valid independent judgement at the pinnacle of their own education.

I bought the tivo competitor, ReplayTV, but it was killed because it automatically skipped ads...or something. It was a long time ago, but it was a great device.

This migration is not new. It's been happening for many years already.

KylinOS is not completely unrelated to Ubuntu Kylin...

Gong bao ji ding, don't you know ðYZ

You can't tell if entangled particles have been observed, or not?

It doesn't have to be. China doesn't much care if the USA is successful or not; only that China isn't held back, which seems to be the USA's MO of late.

Perhaps the USA and China can cooperate.

Lol, I know, I know. The USA is too proud/arrogant/ignorant for that.

Still, it would be nice to see.

There's nothing much to say that China won't share either. China is not the USA. The USA keeps looking in the mirror and thinking it is seeing China.

Perhaps they were forced into doing more than they might have done, by the USA deciding not to share...

It seems to be a pattern. The USA tries to keep China down by raising fences/denying it technology/etc/etc, and China adjusts its priorities accordingly, and overcomes the problems and continues to advance.