Given the disclaimers on the face these chatbots not to believe everything they say, this whole question seems like a no-brainier.

The pope shits bears in the woods?

I was going to buy a Toyota Prius, but decided to buy a Dodge Ram instead because I didn't like the little symbol on the air conditioning dial. And I'll throw a hissy fit at anyone who wonders why.

Ford or Chevy?
Coke or Pepsi?
Playstation or Xbox?
Burger King or McDonalds?

I agree with the part about the colorful fluff, but to be fair the UX is a defining component for some people and they're better off with familiar taskbars, menus and icons (something resembling Windows and MacOS) rather than learning a tiling window manager.

I think you mean MATE, which is a thriving fork of GNOME 2.

Cinnamon is quite different and aims to resemble Windows 7 (and up). Not quite as flashy as Plasma, but I'd argue it doesn't feel old.

Really? An easily-changed icon is the dealbreaker for you, but not the drastically distinct UX philosophies separating the two?

I'm struggling to figure out who those people are.

That doesn't destroy the argument. Ongoing development is simply being slowed down, not stopped. And even then, I've not located any clause in the terms of their subscriptions that you'll enjoy the benefits of highly accelerated bleeding edge development. I've never heard of that from any software company selling subscriptions.

The whole lawsuit is a flop.

The race is literally escalating.

The President confirmed it would be over with in April.

Granted, he didn't specify which April.

import ecclecticfurniture
import breakablekitchenware
import dubaichocolate

# Hey, you're right!

I'll just jump straight to it.

Imagine that you are a Rust developer by trade, and this news results in the creation of more job opportunities for you in a Windows-dominated industry.

Reminds me of colleges using Java in their 100 level computer science courses.