Comment Re:Habeas Corpus not "revoked" (Score 1) 790
"...this sentence makes it clear that you're not really interested in discussion, but in insults."
No fuckboy, I'm interested in discussion with people who do their research, and don't pretend they know what the fuck they're talking about like you have.
I told you once already that this was going to be futile, as my examples were obvious and easy to understand, yet you were ignorant of them.
So, explain to me why I would have anything but comtempt for some asshole (you) who decides to pop off about a subject he clearly is not informed about?
"IOW why are you even posting on Slashdot if you just want to be a dick anytime someone contradicts you at all?"
That might be a good point if that's what happened, but so far no one has contradicted me and I've only been a "dick" to people who were claiming some knowledge of the subject even though their posts show that they're ignorant and not worth attempting to educate (you).
See, I'm not a dick to people who learn about a subject before making assertions of fact. You did not, hence you get dickery.
In the future, if you wish to avoid dickery, stop lying and pretending you're not ignorant. Then you'll avoid getting insulted and being wrong all at once.
More importantly, I gave an example you can't refute, that was obvious like I said. At this point your only response is "Supergood, you're right".
No fuckboy, I'm interested in discussion with people who do their research, and don't pretend they know what the fuck they're talking about like you have.
I told you once already that this was going to be futile, as my examples were obvious and easy to understand, yet you were ignorant of them.
So, explain to me why I would have anything but comtempt for some asshole (you) who decides to pop off about a subject he clearly is not informed about?
"IOW why are you even posting on Slashdot if you just want to be a dick anytime someone contradicts you at all?"
That might be a good point if that's what happened, but so far no one has contradicted me and I've only been a "dick" to people who were claiming some knowledge of the subject even though their posts show that they're ignorant and not worth attempting to educate (you).
See, I'm not a dick to people who learn about a subject before making assertions of fact. You did not, hence you get dickery.
In the future, if you wish to avoid dickery, stop lying and pretending you're not ignorant. Then you'll avoid getting insulted and being wrong all at once.
More importantly, I gave an example you can't refute, that was obvious like I said. At this point your only response is "Supergood, you're right".
