Nah. It probably found instances of modern women talking about how their abortion allowed them to secure wealth and a nice career for themselves, and then correlated that with ancient practices of sacrificing children before demon-gods for wealth, power, and a good harvest, and then generated the image.

I wonder if the most influential data sources can be extracted from the system. I'll have to ask later.
Anyway, I recall that research has shown that if you limit AI to giving answers that only confirm with a particular worldview, the quality and accuracy of results goes down dramatically.

Revoking a degree means nothing. Potential employers only care about the fact that you did earn the degree, not that you have some debt issue with your college. Such a move would just be adding another checkbox to your credit report, which potential employers sometimes check as it is.

Thus your contention that police excuse white crime, and only prosecute black crime? Really? And juries only convict black defendants, not white? Really?

What data do you have that is counter this?

Brightline is a privately owned company. I think they actually intend for this to be a profitable venture- and hence a profitable investment- based on their experience in Florida. So 'We' who might use that money elsewhere is whoever they find as investors or lenders in this project, not any government.
One would have to do some research to be sure whether or not public funding is involved, but I haven't seen any in the linked article.

So much a fiction that Seattle is paying $3.6 million in fines for its existence.

FBI data says you're wrong. 50% of murders are committed by 13% of the population. In fact, in every category of crime, Black or African American commit more than 13% of the crimes.

He should sanction CHAZ, since that was the center of the "troubles".

Twitch can do what it wants; individuals can still bitch about Twitch being subservient to a vocal minority that's generally humorless. That free market thing goes both ways.

Many claim high numbers, but reality is most offshore wind is between 25% and 45%: Source. Check the site every few days and you'll see it bounce around that range. The NREL has some data, showing the mean around 35% or so, but somehow project that to increase to 45% or more over the next few decades. As capacity factor is a function of wind availability, I guess they're expecting it to get windier?

If you're not measuring your penis in hectares, is it even worth talking about?

Much more trustworthy than using surface stations, which have over 92% of stations showing more than 1 deg C errors in them. And where 70% of the surface is ignored.

Gas output spiked, coal maxed out, and wind and solar plummeted. The failure was gas couldn't cover for the complete collapse of solar, and near-complete-collapse of wind. Gas scaled up big-time; coal proved to be a stalwart; wind and solar failed miserably.

Can we not hide the externalities of intermittent power sources, like wind and solar? Make them pay for 100% of the costs of any backup used when they do not generate power?

Fossil fuel use is much higher than originally estimated by Exxon, and the warming trend (per the satellite record - the only truly global dataset we have) is 0.13 deg C/decade.

Gas "only" scaled up 220% during the 2021 power outage in Texas, while wind/solar fell 85%. So gas was blamed because it did not scale up far enough when wind and solar effectively disappeared.