I stand corrected. Thank you. It still seems silly though. 8)

That does not seem reasonable or even likely. over 10 years, it would be 100% brighter? Really? I don't mean to be so pedantic, but that just seems silly.

I always thought that camelCase basically had the first letter lower case, and that it was PascalCase that that had each word upper case the first letter. Am i remembering it wrong?

Pretty sure it is NOT an "AI" chip. It is an older chip / chipset that is legal to export. Think Nvidia Shield class, more than AI class.

Whoops. I did not see the actual comment, and mistakenly thought it was an earlier one. I stand corrected.

Pretty sure he is saying he prefers that AI find the bugs rather than leave them in. I don't think he is implying that AI is creating these bugs.

"Give me a place to stand, and a lever long enough, and I will move the world."
The lever is just as important as the place to stand in this context.

Can you still install the addons outside of the store? I wonder if that might be the best option anyway.

We? I would argue the companies that make the trillions off of oil are the ones responsible for cleaning up after themselves. That is most definitely NOT "we".

It is NOT a public service. Not in any way shape or form. They are a business. It IS entirely their ball. You are neither paying for the service not subsidizing them.

So since we use oil, it is ok that the companies are allowed to avoid cleaning up the mess they made getting it?

I mean they would have to be timed to go off at the same time right? Light is probably fast enough that the distance from the light to the telescope might not matter as much, but they would still need to be synchronized it seems like.

That FEELS like the right way to deal with them, and for most of us it probably is, but for those with the stomach, I say keep at it. Don't engage with them, just keep reporting their bad behavior. Each time you make them create a new account, they have to start over with their followers, and anyone who cares to can see it is a "new" account. There is probably something cathartic in the actions as well.

I tend to use the "try the dumbest thing that could possibly work first" method, then after the concept is proven, I refactor it into good (or varying levels of better) code over the course of a few iterations, until the point where the original does not really exist any more, but it still solves the problem, and has decent tests, logging, and the other things that typically need to be thought about.

If all traffic over the links is encrypted, what does spying on the links gain them? I don't mean to be dense here, I just really don't know.