A whole crop of "influencers" and porn "stars" will soon be out of the business.
To you, perhaps. To the other leftists and bots, they'll just be reflexively anti-Trump like they are on every other 80/20 issue.
You miss the point. Perhaps your bias is blinding you. You said simply if trump signs a treaty the left won't like it. You didn't care to qualify it - as long as Trump signs it you're on board. I'm guessing you've also said something like "Trump could cure cancer and the left would be against it." Cutting research funding is not a good way to cure cancer.
Trump is a cancer on America. Even if you agree with his policies you should still be against the man.
Trump could sign a peace treaty with Russia tomorrow and
You say that as if the terms of the treaty wouldn't matter.
What does his wealth have to do with Apple's ethics or compliance with antitrust law?
Are you assuming his claim is true? He didn't get rich telling the truth. Three different AI apps have reached #1 this year. Deepseek, Perplexity, and GPT.
As bad as 2FA over SMS is, that doesn't stop it from being widely used. I can see a lot of messages ending up there.
Apple already extracts those and offers to fill them in, so I don't think that will be an issue.
This is step 1 in trying to sell their flailing business. They obviously don't expect any more growth or they'd stick with running their own servers. Buyers want to know they can carve up the company easily, so migrating to a public cloud gives them some assurances this is possible. They're certainly hoping to get scooped up on their disintegrating brand awareness before there's no value left.
My company tried to buy them out. They responded:
\
Thank you for your interest in acquiring Stack Overflow. Unfortunately, your proposal has been closed for the following reasons:
If you believe this closure was in error, feel free to [edit] your offer to meet community standards and flag for moderator review.
With regards,
Stack Overflow, Inc.
“Not every problem belongs here.”
lol, no they don't.
Maybe they wanted to broaden their palate. Try some foreign cuisine.
But privacy and data protection has become one of the main selling points for Apple in the last decade or so. They tried to bridge the gap with their "Privat Cloud Compute" approach, but this is so complex and hard to understand (and to implement) that nobody will really care, they will just see "all my data will be processed in the Cloud just as Google does it" and that's it.
From the summary, it seems Apple is asking them to train a model that will run on Apple's private servers, thus maintaining privacy.
What the US needs is more blue color workers
Can Smurfs even get a visa these days?
It gets weirder. Rhapsody had been Sonos' partner streaming service - and Rhapsody is also... I HEART RADIO. Now the whole Napster lot got dumped in the lap of venture capital vultures.
Don't most disk formats have basically just native performance? What can you do wrong to degrade the performance?
As can be seen in this table (from the FA), ASIF is considerably faster than the current UDRW.
It is worth noting even the easiest puzzles here are puzzles which many, if not most humans, cannot solve.
At one point they gave it the algorithm and it still failed. My guess is that the large majority of humans could do it if you showed them how.
Nature always sides with the hidden flaw.
