Bigoted asshole or not, he's got a point. You've both got points. Corporations adopted DEI policies across all industries starting about 2018. The problem is that it wasn't enough to push diversity in casting. The industry also pushed diversity in the writer's room. Companies brought in writers that primarily ticked boxes with a goal toward racial, sex, and sexual orientation variety. Writing skill and experience was a distant, secondary concern. As a result, we've all seen a marked decrease in writing quality across the board. Audiences have noticed too and have reacted by doing things like cutting back on theater attendance.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FFB5C_p6p_Do%3Fsi%3DogITM1lCsDi_Dxk2 is an interesting counter-argument.

Tracked? Mossad isn't interesting in tracking, they're interested in explosions.

Exactly. This was the same industry that was lecturing everyone on intellectual property law not that long ago. Fucking hypocrites.

To put out a hacker prize for laid off employees to target big AI companies for data center elimination.

Only somewhat correct. Unemployed because the AI companies convinced the CEOs that they can cut headcount and be fine.

And with 50% of the software engineers in 2019 now unemployed (even among senior level developers) they'll have you reviewing that code for minimum wage.

That's great to say. Tell it to the food companies. The average American doesn't have a choice in the matter when they're adding it to all the food.

It's a weekly injection, not a pill. And yes, the injection also curbs addictive behavior such as gambling and alcoholism.

OpenSSH is the best known OpenBSD project, but they also makes pf (used in pfSense, OPNSense, etc.), OpenBGP, OpenNTPD, OpenSMTPD, OpenIKED, LibreSSL, etc.

Came for this comment.

First off, this isn't some academic forum where we back up every single claim with evidence.

Second, I'm a progressive liberal and happen to agree with his statement, which wasn't presented in an overtly political manner. Facts don't have a political preference. There certainly are preferential admissions and hiring for women. I've seen them repeatedly over my time in school and over my 20 year career in tech. I've been told repeatedly that "everything men can do women can do better." That statement wasn't created in this thread.

Trump is gutting the EPA and other agencies that would enforce our environmental law. Business has nothing to fear. IF Trumps allows a legitimate election AND a Democrat ever wins the presidency again, they're going to first need to rebuild the entire government and the entire economy before enforcing any laws against businesses, let alone enforcing the environmental laws.

Maybe it'll start working without errors aka "hallucinations." The problem is that the technology is fundamentally disconnected from reality. It reads the writing that we've bothered to put online. But, AI has no means of independently verifying that writing. It has no independent means of verifying the truth or falsehood of a section of text. I don't see a good means for it to get that data without first changing the way in which it interacts with the real world.

These tools generate more hallucinations (aka errors) the more complex the models get. Sure, they can generate a lot of shitty output very fast. My output comes slower, but itâ(TM)s correct. And given that I generate the output myself, I can actually talk about it authoritatively in meetings.