I read the article. That is really the advanced Zen class.
It's not advanced, I shared it because the headline is clear. The article is written in a confusing way because the author doesn't understand the topic. Another way to say the same thing is, "people are flowers," but that's not exactly precise, either.
This one says things along your thinking, "The Cave You Fear to Enter Holds the Treasure You Seek," but make no mistake, there is a destination and it is reachable.
But since we're at it, What is enlightenment?
A more interesting question I think is, does anyone own this AI actress?
That is to say - if a company took her likeness, and used other AI to make porn - could "her" agent sue them?
Or in other words, is a purely AI generated likeness even copyrightable, when technically no human made it?
If they had to verify every single detail what would be the point of using the service?
For me, the point is to find sources. If there's a [citation needed], then it has to be treated as unknown.
This is the same as Wikipedia. It's helpful because the internet has gotten less and less searchable, as spam has crept into Google and other search engines.
Whatever happened to all bugs being shallow with enough eyes? Guess that was always a lie, huh?
That's a stupid take, everyone is using a lot of eyes to find bugs these days. Your software crashes, it sends a bug report back.
A world without Trump voters? Sign me up! Sounds like paradise! Only smart people allowed. Imagine a world in which 85 IQ persons simply did not exist. Collegial doesn't even begin to describe it.
It's not about "starve", they'll be allowed to live out their natural lifespans. One generation and out.
Documentation is the castor oil of programming. Managers know it must be good because the programmers hate it so much.